(no title)
FLUX-YOU | 7 years ago
First of all, that's rude.
Second, if they have a $75b valuation and no profit plan, that's not likely a good sign. I doubt China's P2P and venture capital markets are related, but I'd bet they gave a high valuation just to grab headlines. Also, it'll eventually get censored like everything else in China, so 'doing better than Baidu' is probably temporary.
jasode|7 years ago
Real question: Is there some social etiquette rule that says describing a person to a news audience as "unknown" is being rude? Honestly, I've never heard of that.
If I created a billion dollar company and Bloomberg called me "an unknown", I'd consider it a massive compliment. It means that I was able to grow the company totally under the radar without any distracting interview requests from TechCrunch, TheVerge, Gizmodo, etc.
gutnor|7 years ago
Seems the 35yo bit is irrelevant to the story, that's neither old nor young: you can have a significant career by that point and you are a long way from retiring. So I can understand some people from the Valley would think this is just another case of ageism.
A bit like saying "A Black Woman left me her seat in the bus" can be suspicious even though it is factual.
johnchristopher|7 years ago
isoskeles|7 years ago
j45|7 years ago
A nobody, compared to who? A status quo? Innovation is about outliers getting things done.
Whereas a success like this would normally be celebrated to the moon and back. Why not here? Is this individual's success outside a self-congratulatory echo-chamber?
With media it's worth asking questions about the use of words, because they wordsmith for a living.
moomin|7 years ago
unknown|7 years ago
[deleted]
ijpoijpoihpiuoh|7 years ago
mistrial9|7 years ago
cirgue|7 years ago
apo|7 years ago
amelius|7 years ago
Being unknown to even Google is a huge accomplishment for a 35-yo.
sbr464|7 years ago
bagacrap|7 years ago
mongodude|7 years ago
People said the same thing when Microsoft valued Facebook at $15 billion. Now, in the hindsight, it seems so funny that people frowned upon those valuations.
Power of having many consumers engaged on your platform is too much in digital age.
module0000|7 years ago
duxup|7 years ago
ospider|7 years ago
coldtea|7 years ago
For whom? Because the founder will walk out a billionaire, or at least multi-millionaire, whatever happens...
idrios|7 years ago
desireco42|7 years ago
Also, it is unknown to them, but Bytedance has been around for quite some time and covered in the US. Also, it is not like they are not making money. So many things are wrong with how they cover this.
thomaslangston|7 years ago
tobltobs|7 years ago
unknown|7 years ago
[deleted]