top | item 18291124

(no title)

sesqu | 7 years ago

The article does briefly discuss a slightly more accurate version of that definition, and why it's bad (it's convoluted and relies on the poorly-defined kilogram).

discuss

order

zaarn|7 years ago

The kilogram will get a better definition this year if nothing holds it up (atleast, redefining it based on the planck's constant is planned for the 2018 meeting according to WP).

SamBam|7 years ago

Right, that's a main point of the article.