(no title)
Endama | 7 years ago
Another example is Alexa/Google Home. Some people love the convenience these in-home services provide, but others find the utility itself a liability: is this thing always listening to me and recording me in my home? The robots can do too much, they have too many functions and abilities, which makes me question the intent of the robot.
For robotics to really take off, I think there needs to be a kind of anthropomorphization that needs to happen: the utility of the robot must be high enough that I know that it understands my intention and can respond accordingly; that is to say, that I can have a relationship with my robot.
jpm_sd|7 years ago
soared|7 years ago
wpietri|7 years ago
But in the long term, I think primate tendency toward dominance means that there's a significant market for people who want to boss around things that can be perceived as other people. I doubt many people want robot buddies, but I'd bet there's quite a market for what are in effect robot slaves.
On the one hand, that seems pretty squicky to me. But on the other, if it keeps them from trying to reduce the freedom of other humans, then godspeed.
Endama|7 years ago
7373737373|7 years ago
People have lived with their human-controlled robots for months, some even took them shopping. While some stuff got broken, it can be a very engaging experience.
Loughla|7 years ago
corndoge|7 years ago
eloisant|7 years ago
Whereas you never feel bad for making an appliance work 24/7, or to ask your dishwasher to start his work at 11pm.
atomical|7 years ago
x0x0|7 years ago
The problem is I can get a maid that scrubs my apartment 2x a month for under $200/mo, approx $2k/year. So that sets a very harsh price ceiling on assistance robots.
JohnJamesRambo|7 years ago
patall|7 years ago
Jhsto|7 years ago
[0]: https://dgiese.scripts.mit.edu/talks/
colanderman|7 years ago
gameswithgo|7 years ago
crazysim|7 years ago