(no title)
propman | 7 years ago
Convince congress to extend the federal tax rebate (no real increase in spending just keeping what’s already there) by like 2 years which is just maybe $1-2B more and electric will be the way to go for good!
propman | 7 years ago
Convince congress to extend the federal tax rebate (no real increase in spending just keeping what’s already there) by like 2 years which is just maybe $1-2B more and electric will be the way to go for good!
kllrnohj|7 years ago
US consumer auto sales per year are in the 16-17 million range. I personally wouldn't consider 3% to be "almost 10%", do you?
But I don't think they realistically can hit 500,000 cars next year, either. They moved 70k cars in Q3. There's no reason to believe they can double that in 6 months or so particularly as the Model S & X sales have been fairly stable. So that means the Model 3 needs to somehow grow to around 400k/year in order to get to 500k cars next year.
They state production of Model 3 was up to 5,300 per week and that the production system had stabilized with gradual monthly improvements. So currently Tesla can only even build 275k Model 3's a year. I don't think doubling that in such a short time frame meshes with Tesla's comments of "gradual monthly improvements."
350,000 cars in 2019 seems much more likely assuming Model 3 demand holds strong.
propman|7 years ago
Reason077|7 years ago
But not all of those sales will be in the US. According to the Q3 update document:
"The mid-sized premium sedan market in Europe is more than twice as big as the same segment in the US. This is why we are excited to bring Model 3 to Europe early next year. "
adventured|7 years ago
The parent comment said "cars." You switched that to consumer auto sales. 6.3 million passenger cars were sold in the US in 2017. With passenger car sales declining and generally losing popularity in the US (dropping from 7.9m in 2014), it's plausible that 500,000 will in fact be "almost" 10% of total cars sold in the US in 2019.
antisthenes|7 years ago
Time will tell how good of a choice it is.
aphextron|7 years ago
18650 is the cell form factor, not a specific anode/cathode/electrolyte combo. There have been leaps and bounds in cell chemistry over the last 10 years which have made it possible to build high-end expensive cars, but we still need about double the performance of current tech to achieve true low cost mass adoption. A $45,000 car with 300 miles range is just barely enough to convince well off people to buy a new toy. The first $20,000 EV with 300 miles range will change the world.
greglindahl|7 years ago
simonebrunozzi|7 years ago
marricks|7 years ago
They are able to make the cheapest batteries for cars and have seemed to be pretty successful...
hikari-boulders|7 years ago
bsder|7 years ago
Is that really feasible? That's roughly BMW and Mercedes combined in the US.
It's really easy to forget on the West Coast of the US that BWM, Mercedes and the like are actually rare in the rest of the country.
xienze|7 years ago
madengr|7 years ago
[deleted]
smogcutter|7 years ago
ZeroGravitas|7 years ago
unknown|7 years ago
[deleted]