The paper looks interesting (though I'm not sure how practical it is) but what prompts me to comment is the horrible neologism "trisection".
A "dissection" is to take apart (to transitively section, in other words). If it were to section something in two there would be only one "s". And even reading the paper, the word the authors should have used is good old "intersection".
[+] [-] gumby|7 years ago|reply
A "dissection" is to take apart (to transitively section, in other words). If it were to section something in two there would be only one "s". And even reading the paper, the word the authors should have used is good old "intersection".
[+] [-] supercasio|7 years ago|reply