[mohammedbin]

You're arguing a tangential point. Why is it okay to say - "kill all whites" and the platform let's you be but not okay for a user to say "kill jews" and the platform boots the user and yet gets booted itself.

[jbarciauskas]

There is no credible threat against white people as a group. Those who say this generally do so as a way to raise awareness of the very real threats posed by white supremacists, not as a real threat. Taken in context, the distinction is easy to make.

[Inconel]

As a non-white person who is wholly unsympathetic to the ideas espoused by white supremacists, partly out of reasons of self preservation, making statements such as "kill all whites" doesn't seem like a particularly good method of raising awareness of the dangers posed by hateful and bigoted ideologies. Then again I don't spend much time on Twitter so maybe such statements are able to lead to constructive dialogue there.

[jnbiche]

Oh, come on. As today's horrible event demonstrated, all it takes is one single unbalanced individual with a semi-automatic weapon, and the members of any group -- white, black, Asian, Latino, Jewish, Muslim -- are at risk.

And writing about killing members of any group only services to rile up and incite those people among us who are predisposed to violence. And those people are of every color and nationality that exists.

[aldoushuxley001]

Your comment gives some incredible insight into the mental gymnastic people are capable of in order to justify their own violence & intimidation.

[ascorbic]

You missed an important step: nobody was on the platform saying "kill all whites" and then going and actually killing whites.

If there was a site that was filled with people saying "kill all whites", and the site was fine with this, and then one of its members went and murdered a load of white people, then yes I'd say they would probably be booted by their host too. They don't get points for booting the actual murderer after he'd done the murders.

[jrs95]

<deleted>

[jrs95]

Media and activists that pressure social media platforms, advertisers etc. treat the two very differently. Yes, whites are generally the privileged group, but I don't think it's reasonable to say that excuses the type of behavior you're talking about happening on Twitter, and that sort of thing feeds into the conspiracy theories you'll find in places like Gab.

[SwellJoe]

That's not the conversation I'm having.

Surely, you can see that a sustained effort to recruit for racist violence, and an ongoing celebration of racist violence, by people who have a history of racist violence, is not comparable to a joke about killing white people by someone who is not organizing to commit violence against white people or celebrating the death of or violence against innocent white people. The fact that you know enough about the situation to make that comparison, but still ask that question...means that I can't trust the sincerity of your question.

[Inconel]

While I find statements like "kill all whites" to be hateful and unproductive, I'm certainly in agreement that such statements don't pose the same threat to whites as white supremacists ideologies pose to non-whites, largely based on the current power structures in the US and West. However I would caution you in your assumption that the same people who would "joke" about killing white people aren't also celebrating when death and violence is visited upon some innocent white person. From my experience there's certainly quite a bit of overlap between the two.

[mohammedbin]

Please don't make ad-hominem attacks, you're hurting HN as a community.