(no title)
Fuxy | 7 years ago
Just the same way you don't give your money to a beggar on the street when you can barely afford to survives yourself the employment of personal boundaries is important for humans and countries.
So given that Italy is not doing so well at the moment I kind of have to question their thinking reducing their revenue stream in favour if immigrants.
The assumption that all immigration is good immigration is not true.
kranner|7 years ago
Fuxy|7 years ago
forapurpose|7 years ago
Italy is a modern, advanced, wealthy economy - I would guess they are more wealthy than any country in the history of the world before 1970. They can do far more than afford to survive, and they can help those in need. Current people in Italy benefit from a long history of 'humanitarianism' by their predecessors; it's not an exceptional behavior, it's the norm.
Human beings are more important than money. Also, those human beings will grow the economy in the future - in the near future. In the long run they also keep the demographics from getting exceptionally old.
> The assumption that all immigration is good immigration is not true.
I'm not sure what that means, nor did I hear anyone say it.
Daishiman|7 years ago
On the other hand, why do you falsely assume that acceptance of refugees has to have no limits or conditions? I'm saying that you can achieve a level of practical balance for two different areas on unrelated motives.
Fuxy|7 years ago
Because it doesn't have a limit or conditions the overwhelming majority of assumed refugees are illegal immigrants brought over on the boats of NGO's. They haven't used the proper channels and haven't been checked what so ever in many cases it's not even possible to know their country of origin forget about anything else.
If they have completed the proper procedures and done all the paperwork for seeking asylum fair enough but that's not what's happening now they just show up.