[IBM]

A few months ago Bloomberg published a story which I'm 99% sure was directed by Facebook PR, in-line with their strategy being reported on in this story [1][2].

Also can any mods tell me why all my comments are dead?

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-08/is-apple-...

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17719607

[skeptic_69]

I don't know if THIS article was directed by Facebook related PR but the times reporting says there is other PR basically identical to this. So I think we can decisively label your conjecture as "credible"

[CamperBob2]

At the risk of earning one of those (dead) tags myself, I'm starting to think that Bloomberg is basically a PR Newswire for people who want to spread BS about something or someone.

The Facebook-planted story, combined with their recent questionable reporting on hacked motherboard hardware that nobody seems interested in corroborating, doesn't paint a trustworthy picture of the Bloomberg organization as a whole. At least not IMO.

[naravara]

Wow, first the embarrassment around that secret chips planted in our data-centers story and now this. It's going to be a long time before I take Bloomberg's tech industry coverage seriously again.

[nkurz]

Also can any mods tell me why all my comments are dead?

Write to '[e-mail]' and ask --- and report back what they say. It looks like it's because of your comment linking Russia and Assange, but it's not clear if this was because it was too pro, too anti, or just because it mentioned one or the other. I'd guess it's user flagging gone awry, but maybe it's a new automated system that's broken instead.

[eiaoa]

> It looks like it's because of your comment linking Russia and Assange,

I don't think so, my guess is that it was due to one of the comments prior to the one you mentioned, or some activity that occurred on the same IP IBM was using.

[IBM]

I actually sent them 3 over the past two weeks but never got a reply. I'm guessing no one stays on top of the inbox.