From the FAQ page:
"8) Your logo is upside down: Why is the light source obviously below the image? It looks quite unnatural...
The logo is simply a scan of my hand, from a flatbed scanner converted to black and white. The "back" in the picture is the scanner cover, and the shadows are from the scanner light."
But no image on the main page =(
I really wish they'd archived that, too.
(Says something about the necessity of making v1 look good. Of course, the web was a different place in '97.)
it's probably meaningless by now... my guess is that the reason why google doesn't publish stats, they simply don't want bing or yahoo or someone else claim to have the biggest index and gain cheap press coverage... after all it's not about how big index you got but you are doing with it
Why was my title edited? It is so OG [1]. Think about it in the context of, this is my research project/company launch page. OG is accurate and should not have been stripped from the headline. Unless of course someone did this first?
[+] [-] erikpukinskis|15 years ago|reply
Scott: http://www.zdnet.com/news/life-after-google-with-millions/18...
Alan: http://www.thealarmclock.com/mt/archives/2007/05/google_weat... / http://news.cnet.com/Start-up-warms-up-personal-robots/2100-...
[+] [-] dasil003|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] David|15 years ago|reply
The logo is simply a scan of my hand, from a flatbed scanner converted to black and white. The "back" in the picture is the scanner cover, and the shadows are from the scanner light."
But no image on the main page =( I really wish they'd archived that, too. (Says something about the necessity of making v1 look good. Of course, the web was a different place in '97.)
[+] [-] jawee|15 years ago|reply
Found at: http://www.google.com/logos/fan.html (scroll to the bottom and it has older official Google logos)
[+] [-] Kilimanjaro|15 years ago|reply
http://web.archive.org/web/19971210065425/backrub.stanford.e...
[+] [-] tragiclos|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lubos|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] n-named|15 years ago|reply
[1] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=og
[+] [-] scotth|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] n-named|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mek|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]