[throwaway487550]

How abstract concepts, introduced to establish artificial symmetry, could be used to describe aspects of reality which does not rely on any abstract notions whatsoever?

Some processes are symmetrical to an outside observer, which does not imply that anything must be or should be symmetrical. It is an observer's preference to see symmetry everywhere.

There is no such fucking things as "dark" liquids or negative "masses" merely because a model superimposed on reality have nothing to do with reality itself.

The impossibility is the same as the principal impossibility of revealing the CPU's actual wiring from the level of code it runs. There is not a single fucking way to do it in principle, no mater what fancy guesswork one would use or what kind of a wrongly simulated model one will superimpose on what one is able to "see" and examine.

This is not even science, but some sort of contest of abstract theology, crafted to please fellow reviewers and sectarians.