(no title)
sentenza | 7 years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citro%C3%ABn_Jumpy
If you want a car that looks slightly better and costs a bit more, you could go with a VW T6:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Transporter_(T6)
Here in Europe, most people with your usage pattern would actually just buy a station wagon and hitch a trailer to it when needed:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opel_Insignia#/media/File:Opel...
There are even rooftop containers for kayaks and specific cycle holders for the rear of the car so that you can go camping with a typical European station wagon without having to use a trailer.
I'm not trying to complain about the choices you made, but rather trying to emphasize the point of the article. Pickup trucks are more of a cultural phenomenon than a practical necessity. If the emission standards are raised, other solutions will appear without much/any loss in convenience.
wafflesraccoon|7 years ago
I 100% agree that pickups are a American cultural icon (just look at the ads, they drip nationalism) but it is hard to argue that they are not practical.
sentenza|7 years ago
I'd say that the vehicles I listed and pickup trucks manage fairly equally in the above transport categories (tools, furniture, kayak, bike). The way to go about it is just different.
But: Pickup trucks outclass all the vehicles I listed as soon as you leave the tarmac. Here in Germany, many people in rural areas who would own a pickup truck in the US also own a "family tractor" for working in the woods or in other off-road locations.
Then again: The vehicles I listed will always be faster on the Autobahn than a pickup truck. I regularly see people in station wagons go 160km/h and above for prolonged distances on the A3 at night.
In the end, I find it extremely fascinating how a different regulatory environment has bred different 'species' of utility vehicles on both sides of the Atlantic.