Neat news. I've been thinking about trying one of those out for a while now - I really want to find a pointing/clicking device other than a traditional mouse as my hands age, but nothing's properly worked yet.
Linus is amazing. Is anyone else a bit unnerved that the entire tech world seems to hinge on the good instincts of this one guy? I hope there is another benevolent dictator to take over once he's gone.
Linus took a break during the previous release cycle and much of his work was taken up by Greg Kroah-Hartman. At this point the kernel development process is very extablished and hierarchical and seems to be in a good place for the long term.
let' not go too far. linux is still a hobby operating system grown into some bloated piece of crap even it's inventor is depressed about ;)... but yeah... i if people are still afraid of bsd then you are somewhat right...
Used it since 10.04 against over 100 servers and I agree it worked really well.
95% of the time it had packages I need and the rest of 5% only meant stuff I wanted to use was too new to go into packages of the LTS at that time.
Unless you need 10 years level of stability at the cost of losing package count and freshness to go with RHEL/CentOS, I don't think there isn't much of a reason not to use Ubuntu Server edition.
Ubuntu Server is nice due to the commercial support that's available from Ubuntu, but Debian is also very widely used on the server. And with the newer releases (Debian Stretch and later) it's gaining potential as a desktop OS too.
What does decentralised means in this context? There are possibly thousands of companies/projects/orgs releasing their own version of the linux kernel.
Plus, as a user, I trust Linus more than any decentralised process I can think of.
[+] [-] adamheath|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wodenokoto|7 years ago|reply
Why aren't these things a driver?
[+] [-] Illniyar|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eponeponepon|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cranjice|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] craftyguy|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] camdenlock|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chkaloon|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ufo|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] throw-far-away|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ip26|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zozbot123|7 years ago|reply
We'll still have Theo.
[+] [-] vectorEQ|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lucb1e|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vectorEQ|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] black-tea|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fattire|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] akskos|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] amself|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] 7of9ismywifi|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] robertAngst|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] h1d|7 years ago|reply
95% of the time it had packages I need and the rest of 5% only meant stuff I wanted to use was too new to go into packages of the LTS at that time.
Unless you need 10 years level of stability at the cost of losing package count and freshness to go with RHEL/CentOS, I don't think there isn't much of a reason not to use Ubuntu Server edition.
[+] [-] zozbot123|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sigmaprimus|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jeanlucas|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Retr0spectrum|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] _eht|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] sbr464|7 years ago|reply
If you build software, push forward.
[+] [-] atmosx|7 years ago|reply
Plus, as a user, I trust Linus more than any decentralised process I can think of.
[+] [-] znpy|7 years ago|reply
What more could you want ?
[+] [-] Valmar|7 years ago|reply
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/22/221