I'm struck that it appears to do very little local caching. In that sense it feels like a highly polished web app, always at the mercy of an available network.
Also, it's iPhone-only. Following the direct download link from an iPod or iPad yields an error. Guess I'm sticking with Boxcar for iPad push notifications.
The inbox is incredibly slow to load up ("refreshing conversations...") compared to the native SMS app or even Whatsapp (iPhone 4, 4.2, 3G 3 bars). And while it loads up, it doesn't seem to be possible to switch from the inbox to the dialer or the "Menu"...
It's also crashed twice when opening after receiving a text notification.
(disappointed sigh).
The "no caching" effect is much less pronounced with fast app switching. Are you on iOS 3.x?
Also, in my experience, there are often weird consistency errors in the App Store when something new is rolling out. (I could only see it on my Mac for a while before it appeared on my phone.) Try again in an hour.
Google Voice is kind of the wrong product for the wrong time. It improves voice telephone calls exactly at a time when that's no longer very interesting.
The only semi-interesting thing would be cheap international calls - but I have Skype for this already.
Voice mail, I don't use. If it was improved like with GV - I'd still not use it. SMS, I have plenty of free texts, never exceed my limit - though I wonder how they get away with making them free, given that carriers make lots of money with that.
One number to rule them all - that would be cool - except if it's controlled by one company which will eventually seek to monetize. Those chefs and massage services cost money... I don't, by the way, see how being available on the phone to anyone at any time, no matter what number they call and no matter where I am - as a feature. More like a bug. I am already easily reachable on my phone, via SMS, via emails. I don't need to be any more available.
For me, Google Voice's features allow me more granular control over my availability, and reduce the total time my telephone takes by letting me skim textual versions of voicemails, direct calls hither and thither, etc.
This long-awaited arrival throws quite the wrench into the Android v. iOS platform wars.
Google was obviously already on the iPhone (with search, its popular native app, gmail, etc.), but Google Voice is clearly different in that in competes with the core functions of the phone.
What do you guys think the impact of this will be? Could Google use this as a Trojan horse to hook people on GV then try to upsell them to an Android device with better GV integration? Or will it not matter?
For an upsell to work, you'd first have to believe that people buy iPhones primarily to make phone calls. Then you'd have to believe that these phone-centric individuals are tolerant of the voice latency in GV calls. I don't see it.
I think its yet another killer Android application that is now available on iPhone. While I can see their logic in this instance I still don't understand why Google insists on porting all of their good Android applications across, removing any competitive advantage they give to Android.
It appears number portability and iPod Touch support is not on their priority list. I have no clue why. With those two features, personally, I would be free from cell phone carriers.
There are way more iPod touches out there than iPhones. This could have been a great ipod touch app for people who don't want to pay ridiculous amounts for a phone.
Google intends to release a version that will work with the iPad/iPod Touch (no VoIP calls, at least at first, but you'll be able to use texts and access your voicemail).
This is great - but you still have to be in the app to make a phone call (doesn't integrate with the native iPhone phone app well). Does anyone know if the Android version has tighter integration?
I'd like to not have to remember to launch the app to return a call and use the native SMS app to send from my GV number. Is this possible with the Android version?
Overall the polish of the app seems a little lacking but the fact that push notifications are finally available makes it the service itself actually usable on an iPhone. I'm not amazed but certainly a happier person than I was yesterday.
It's ironic that Apple might have changed their app store rules to allow a Google product (GV) into the app store in order to counter another Google product (Android)
It is ironic but I think there is some truth to it. The gmail client for android is way better than anything available for iPhone, and so ultimately unless Apple is willing to offer apps that are roughly as good, it might as well allow users to use Google's.
I could see someone choosing Android just for the gmail app if email was very important and the other iPhone advantages didn't outweigh it. Mail.app for iPhone reminds me of the bad old days of email.
I think the current GV app is really a stripped down version of the one that Google originally planned. Didn't Apple lambast the original GV because it took over the standard phone functions.
There are some rough edges (like the SMS sending screen, yuck) but what I'm impressed by is how performant the app is on my old-ass 3G. It seems to open faster than the SMS or Dialer apps do. Probably 'cause it was developed back when the 3G was cutting-edge!
GV Mobile+ still has a lot of features that this official google app doesn't match, like the ability to paste phone numbers into the dial pad and ability to rout numbers via Skype.
GV Mobile+ has a lot of extra features, but I feel like the native Google Voice app is faster and aesthetically pleasing to the eye. There were also always glitches with the GV Mobile+ app I used, e.g. text disappearing or hiding behind a whole line of whitespace.
[+] [-] irons|15 years ago|reply
Also, it's iPhone-only. Following the direct download link from an iPod or iPad yields an error. Guess I'm sticking with Boxcar for iPad push notifications.
[+] [-] nirmal|15 years ago|reply
Same here, except using Notifo.
[+] [-] BlazingFrog|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] samps|15 years ago|reply
Also, in my experience, there are often weird consistency errors in the App Store when something new is rolling out. (I could only see it on my Mac for a while before it appeared on my phone.) Try again in an hour.
[+] [-] jdg|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nikster|15 years ago|reply
The only semi-interesting thing would be cheap international calls - but I have Skype for this already.
Voice mail, I don't use. If it was improved like with GV - I'd still not use it. SMS, I have plenty of free texts, never exceed my limit - though I wonder how they get away with making them free, given that carriers make lots of money with that.
One number to rule them all - that would be cool - except if it's controlled by one company which will eventually seek to monetize. Those chefs and massage services cost money... I don't, by the way, see how being available on the phone to anyone at any time, no matter what number they call and no matter where I am - as a feature. More like a bug. I am already easily reachable on my phone, via SMS, via emails. I don't need to be any more available.
Anything that I'm missing? Why would I want GV?
[+] [-] khafra|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dotpavan|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] johns|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gte910h|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] waxman|15 years ago|reply
Google was obviously already on the iPhone (with search, its popular native app, gmail, etc.), but Google Voice is clearly different in that in competes with the core functions of the phone.
What do you guys think the impact of this will be? Could Google use this as a Trojan horse to hook people on GV then try to upsell them to an Android device with better GV integration? Or will it not matter?
[+] [-] irons|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rodh257|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] masklinn|15 years ago|reply
Apple does the majority of its sales outside the US. GV does not work outside the US.
[+] [-] SriniK|15 years ago|reply
I think the most important thing is, Google would get contacts this way. I already uploaded my address book removing email ids from the csv file.
[+] [-] ja27|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ceejayoz|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] motvbi|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] avner|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] smackfu|15 years ago|reply
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/General...
[+] [-] jkincaid|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] davemabe|15 years ago|reply
I'd like to not have to remember to launch the app to return a call and use the native SMS app to send from my GV number. Is this possible with the Android version?
[+] [-] tdfx|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] igravious|15 years ago|reply
sniff sniff
Do I have to make a sacrifice to some modern deity or something to see this on our side of the pond? Oh pretty please Goog? :)
[+] [-] mambodog|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tdfx|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] keltex|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sgk284|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] grandalf|15 years ago|reply
I could see someone choosing Android just for the gmail app if email was very important and the other iPhone advantages didn't outweigh it. Mail.app for iPhone reminds me of the bad old days of email.
[+] [-] slowpoison|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] BlazingFrog|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] j_b_f|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] AndrewWarner|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chesspro|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] billboebel|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] p0ppe|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kylec|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] marknutter|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rbxbx|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stevenp|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] gustaf|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] csomar|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]