top | item 19123207

Captain Marvel throwback site

192 points| ChrisArchitect | 7 years ago |marvel.com | reply

84 comments

order
[+] codetrotter|7 years ago|reply
I think they did a great job of capturing the essence of the late 90’s and early 00’s homepages web with this.

The technical implementation details not being historically accurate don’t matter IMO.

It’s about the aesthetics and the spirit.

I feel at home.

See also Prof. Dr. style which is related though a bit more toned down. http://contemporary-home-computing.org/prof-dr-style/

[+] judge2020|7 years ago|reply
> The technical implementation details not being historically accurate don’t matter IMO.

Same, it doesn't matter. If anything, the fact that both this page and the movie itself use modern techniques to convey '95 style and setting just adds to the experience.

[+] bostonpete|7 years ago|reply
I dunno, looks way too good on mobile to be a 90's site... ;-)
[+] Aloha|7 years ago|reply
I think its because both <blink> and <marquee> no longer work in modern browsers consistently.

Also, fun thing I noticed, if you google for <marquee> a part of the results page scrolls side to side, like marquee would!

[+] CM30|7 years ago|reply
Interesting how even this throwback apparently requires JavaScript to run. Guess your devs couldn't stay away from the SPA setup for a single site then?
[+] outsidetheparty|7 years ago|reply
I'm 99% sure that's part of the joke. Personally I love how much effort was expended here to make the latest techniques look like the oldest ones.
[+] seba_dos1|7 years ago|reply
It's 300KB of JS and 3.5MB of content. Viewing it back then would be very, very painful (and even today could be way faster).
[+] thosakwe|7 years ago|reply
Is it seriously that big a deal that a website uses Javascript?
[+] svantana|7 years ago|reply
Wasn't javascript the main way to get moving elements in webpages? Here they're using css animations, which definitely weren't around in those days. So I guess the style is throwback, not the implementation...
[+] crooked-v|7 years ago|reply
Should have used SSR if they really had to stick with the SPA angle for it.
[+] classichasclass|7 years ago|reply
Outstanding, but it would be even funnier if it actually did render on Netscape Navigator 3.
[+] burk96|7 years ago|reply
The Browse Happy upgrade your browser thing was admittedly disappointing to find in the source
[+] bane|7 years ago|reply
I kept scrolling down to find the "Marvel Web Ring" and found the hidden Stan Lee instead.
[+] giorgioz|7 years ago|reply
I also found the tiny gif of Stan Lee in the long empty footer. It appears if you pass over it with the mouse. Does it do anything else?
[+] minimaxir|7 years ago|reply
Interesting way to do a throwback but still maintain modern web-design standards (OG tags, responsive, SEO, etc.)

Viewing a real 1995 site on a mobile device is not as pleasant.

[+] archgoon|7 years ago|reply
Also unicode.

Я0XX0ЯZ!!1

I seem to recall that Western or Latin-1 encoding was more common (or at least, Netscape would assume) than UTF-8 in 1995. This resulted in some sites not displaying Russian characters correctly when you visited a site that didn't specify the encoding. Manually setting the encoding at times would be required.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_8859-1

[+] kokokokoko|7 years ago|reply
I always enjoy these old school style sites. DHTMLConf had a fun one a while back[0].

What is a little strange is that I'm starting to see these sites as fun and refreshing as opposed to annoying and obtrusive. I wonder if we are getting close to a flip in design tastes away from making UX as minimal as possible.

[0] http://dhtmlconf.com

[+] gambiting|7 years ago|reply
What's strange to me is that younger Marvel fans(say a 12 year old born in 2007) would probably have no idea why this is amazing.
[+] craigkerstiens|7 years ago|reply
This is amazing, reminds me of a colleague's personal site: http://bitfission.com/. He built it as a bit of de-stressing after a really long work week many years ago dealing with a major AWS outage. I believe he even combed through the geocities archives to be historically accurate.
[+] discopicante|7 years ago|reply
Solid 90s. Would have been even more authentic if upon viewing the source code I would have seen more <table>, <center>, and <font> tags.
[+] drchiu|7 years ago|reply
Absolutely. First thing I did when I landed was view source code. Regardless, nice piece of work.
[+] lukifer|7 years ago|reply
Complete with <blink> tag, re-implemented with CSS3 animations. Well-played, Marvel.
[+] ancarda|7 years ago|reply
There's no "under construction" GIF. I'm very disappointed.
[+] balivandi|7 years ago|reply
Nor a page hit counter!!!
[+] ChoGGi|7 years ago|reply
:) I was looking for one as well.
[+] rayiner|7 years ago|reply
Still better than many modern sites.

1) You can clearly tell what's a link or a button.

2) It doesn't break scrolling or the back button.

[+] ian0|7 years ago|reply
First the "make your sites pages instant" snippet and now this. How lovely it is to click on a link and not wait :)

The last time I can remember that feeling is when I first arrived at college. The LAN network in the college was connected to the largest backbone link in the country. We had download speeds of 1mb / second. It blitzed through geocities sites.

[+] irrational|7 years ago|reply
Be sure to scroll down to the comments at the bottom. Hilarious in jokes.
[+] oakmad|7 years ago|reply
Oh how this made me realize just how much I miss the internet of the 90s.
[+] nazri1|7 years ago|reply
Blank space at the bottom - just so when you page down through the page and reach the end, the last readable content would correctly shift up the same amount as the previous shift.
[+] raydev|7 years ago|reply
The most impressive part, to me: they've compressed the images in a way that makes them look like they were rendered when I used IE4 on my Windows 3.11 machine.

What sort of compression is it where all the colors are comprised of cross+star shapes? How would you compress these images to look like this in 2019?

[+] aerovistae|7 years ago|reply
Don't really understand the relevance of the site's throwback style to the film itself. Anyone care to explain?