top | item 19239305

(no title)

okram | 7 years ago

A colleague of mine who gets confused by "all the symbols" said that they appreciated the verbose stream notation that I build throughout the article. I would recommend giving the article a earnest try up through to page 5. Then after that, jump to page 17 and read Section 5C on Set Operations. See if the standard concepts of union, intersection, difference, etc. mixed with the verbose stream notation gives you insight and ultimately, the confidence to keep trying to tackle the work.

discuss

order

slack3r|7 years ago

sed is already Turing-complete (https://catonmat.net/proof-that-sed-is-turing-complete).

I'm not sure how what you are proposing is any better than sed. I said math envy since you resorted to using algebraic ring theory when there was a much simpler solution. xD

okram|7 years ago

There are many Turing Complete languages. There are many stream-based languages. Moreover, there are many Turing Complete stream-based languages. These are instances of the presented stream ring algebra. I wanted to understand the foundation of such languages so as to have the algebraic toolkit to generate more instances.