It's weird. The most popular shape of diamond is about to become a ~10 to 50cm long rod, not even polished (not very shiny at all, it's somewhere between white and light grey and looks like it's covered in fine dust, like a natural diamond in a regular shape). It's already that way for Rubies:
(this is likely made by buying such laser rods and cutting them up) (corundum is the name of the material, Rubies and Sapphires are the forms of it. These will be cut rubies. They're quite spectacular looking)
Well the Tesla will definitely get you a lot more utility. In fact any car is probably a better purchase than any diamond. Probably depreciates less quickly too...
In my opinion, there's a significant marketing opportunity for lab grown diamonds - a not for profit that makes beautiful artificial pieces that cost just as much as one that's mined, and with the cost difference pays for a significant amount of charity.
Rather than a shameful knockoff, it should aim to draw attention to the fact that it is what it is.
While not universal, I think a $5k artificial ring that looks great and also comes with a story of saving a life on Watsi or building a well in a village would be a compelling product to a substantial number of people.
Of course not. I’d rather it be used for some useful scientific purpose rather than a gaudy jewel. Young couples have way better things to save their money for, like a down payment on a house, or child care, or a college fund. My wife and I got matching tungsten carbide rings that look way cooler than any diamond, and we spent less than $600 on the pair.
The diamond I purchased for my wife's engagement ring costed about the headline price, and it wasn't lab-grown. If the lab-grown diamond was significantly better in specification for the same price, I'd probably have no issue buying it. If no one can tell without specialized equipment and your spouse doesn't care, why not?
But if there wasn't a significant improvement in the diamond across several dimensions, I'd stick with the "real" one. When I purchased one I used diamond screener[1] to find as efficient a price as possible for what I was willing to spend. My research at that time showed that there wasn't a significant price improvement in lab-grown diamonds compared "real" diamonds at the most efficient prices for similar quality. But maybe that's changed now.
In any case, I think it would be great if the price of diamonds came down overall. Lab-grown diamonds are hopefully a good step in that direction. Though I'm concerned they'll evolve to be just as expensive, but marketed to a different set of values.
EDIT: Am I being offtopic? Why am I being downvoted?
you need to catch up on lab-grown stones. Basically, they look better, keep their shine longer (i.e. no need to polish that often) and cost 10% of the "real one".
Just realize that intrinsic cost of diamonds is basically 0. Supply is artifically limited by De Beers and Co, demand is pushed up by shiny catalogues and stereotypes etc.
Now that many more labs are going to create moissanites and likes due to expiring patents, diamonds are going down the same path as pearls went ages ago (when people started growing them on mass scale).
So, my prediction is diamonds will lose at least 90% value in coming years, and lab-grown stones take over by storm, pushing overall bling-bling value even further down, making it as common as zirconia or stuff like that.
p.s. 2 of my first engagement rings were real diamonds, north of $5k value each. The most recent one is a custom made moissanite of better clarity and bigger size at < $1k. All girls were happy with their rings ;)
My history is probably a little off, but the first time I heard of lab grown diamonds in the press was right around the time a couple people were testing a theory that they could identify diamond bearing rock from aerial surveys.
They bought a chunk of land in Canada and turned it into a big ol’ diamond mine. Another source of conflict free diamonds (other than the poor bastards who sold their mineral rights) and at a comparable price.
Like many I always thought I wouldn't buy a diamond, I saw no reason to buy what was basically just a rock (to me), but when I proposed to my girlfriend, since the ring didn't have a diamond, she said no.
> "I have no idea why no one else has mentioned this."
It certainly has been mentioned before. It's a FAQ:
> "Are paywalls ok?"
> "It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds."
> "In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so. But please don't post complaints about paywalls. Those are off topic."
Just got our wedding rings in the mail: matching meteorite, dinosaur femur, and titanium rings. $600 for the pair. So god no, I wouldn't pay that much. I could have a pretty dope hobbiest genetic engineering lab for that money.
[+] [-] chias|7 years ago|reply
I'd go with the car, personally.
[+] [-] candiodari|7 years ago|reply
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/212422-this-new-high-pow...
It's weird. The most popular shape of diamond is about to become a ~10 to 50cm long rod, not even polished (not very shiny at all, it's somewhere between white and light grey and looks like it's covered in fine dust, like a natural diamond in a regular shape). It's already that way for Rubies:
https://youtu.be/KzI3vaIb0aI?t=78
The positive is: those rods aren't very expensive. You want to score this Valentine's day ? May I advise:
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/3-0-12mm-AAAAA-Quality-Loose...
(this is likely made by buying such laser rods and cutting them up) (corundum is the name of the material, Rubies and Sapphires are the forms of it. These will be cut rubies. They're quite spectacular looking)
[+] [-] throwawaymath|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] reitzensteinm|7 years ago|reply
Rather than a shameful knockoff, it should aim to draw attention to the fact that it is what it is.
While not universal, I think a $5k artificial ring that looks great and also comes with a story of saving a life on Watsi or building a well in a village would be a compelling product to a substantial number of people.
[+] [-] hotsauceror|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] throwawaymath|7 years ago|reply
But if there wasn't a significant improvement in the diamond across several dimensions, I'd stick with the "real" one. When I purchased one I used diamond screener[1] to find as efficient a price as possible for what I was willing to spend. My research at that time showed that there wasn't a significant price improvement in lab-grown diamonds compared "real" diamonds at the most efficient prices for similar quality. But maybe that's changed now.
In any case, I think it would be great if the price of diamonds came down overall. Lab-grown diamonds are hopefully a good step in that direction. Though I'm concerned they'll evolve to be just as expensive, but marketed to a different set of values.
EDIT: Am I being offtopic? Why am I being downvoted?
__________________
1. No affiliation, but I highly recommend.
[+] [-] odnarupoque|7 years ago|reply
Just realize that intrinsic cost of diamonds is basically 0. Supply is artifically limited by De Beers and Co, demand is pushed up by shiny catalogues and stereotypes etc.
Now that many more labs are going to create moissanites and likes due to expiring patents, diamonds are going down the same path as pearls went ages ago (when people started growing them on mass scale).
So, my prediction is diamonds will lose at least 90% value in coming years, and lab-grown stones take over by storm, pushing overall bling-bling value even further down, making it as common as zirconia or stuff like that.
p.s. 2 of my first engagement rings were real diamonds, north of $5k value each. The most recent one is a custom made moissanite of better clarity and bigger size at < $1k. All girls were happy with their rings ;)
[+] [-] DATACOMMANDER|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] azhenley|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] skrebbel|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JohnTHaller|7 years ago|reply
* Created by DeBeers marketers
[+] [-] kylec|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] m0zg|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hinkley|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] drcongo|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bsder|7 years ago|reply
I wonder why that is?
[+] [-] hinkley|7 years ago|reply
They bought a chunk of land in Canada and turned it into a big ol’ diamond mine. Another source of conflict free diamonds (other than the poor bastards who sold their mineral rights) and at a comparable price.
[+] [-] supermw|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jdormit|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adrianN|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mastrsushi|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] grzm|7 years ago|reply
It certainly has been mentioned before. It's a FAQ:
> "Are paywalls ok?"
> "It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds."
> "In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so. But please don't post complaints about paywalls. Those are off topic."
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html
[+] [-] medecau|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hotsauceror|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] monocasa|7 years ago|reply