Not to rain on your parade with nicely formatted code like hardly any shell projects do, but what I would have expected for such a tool that I just want to use:
Only gave it a quick look and saw the other comment asking for dependencies. if there are some, why not list them in the README.
I'm really not against installers, but falls under the "small handy tool" category and not "I will spend time automating the install, either it works or it doesn't"
Why are you using a URL in place of a domain name, in the invocation example? Seems confusing. I would expect to see just a domain name there. Although I wouldn't complain if it works with both a domain and a full URL, automatically stripping off the parts it doesn't need. Also seeing http:// instead of https:// is starting to feel strange these days, but I do realize both are still used and your tool works with both as it should.
Very nice readme! And nice to see it has a man page. I would leave out the "It's simple:" line because that tends to make less confident people (like new people just learning) blame themselves if they have problems, and then instead of giving you feedback they'll give up and move on.
I suggest a convenient way to set cookie or auth headers. A lot of endpoints are behind authentication. The --req-headers flag is feasible, but there should be a shortcut flag just for authentication headers. Maybe --cookie and --auth ?
Here is a similar tool all contained in one shell script that only depends on openssl. [1] Albeit, a bit more verbose and doesn't have that nice one page output.
wink|7 years ago
wget https://github/.../releases/.../stable/htrace.sh
Only gave it a quick look and saw the other comment asking for dependencies. if there are some, why not list them in the README.
I'm really not against installers, but falls under the "small handy tool" category and not "I will spend time automating the install, either it works or it doesn't"
kylek|7 years ago
bloopernova|7 years ago
https://github.com/trimstray/htrace.sh/issues/18
Those instructions definitely need to be in the installation section!!
newman314|7 years ago
salamander014|7 years ago
It's called Swiss Army Knife for SMTP, or "SWAKS" for short.
http://www.jetmore.org/john/code/swaks/
This tool is one of the best tools I've ever seen. It's well thought out, well designed, and the documentation is very usable.
(Full disclosure: I have no affiliation with the author or the tool.)
bloopernova|7 years ago
Make life a little easier for the user ;)
natch|7 years ago
Why are you using a URL in place of a domain name, in the invocation example? Seems confusing. I would expect to see just a domain name there. Although I wouldn't complain if it works with both a domain and a full URL, automatically stripping off the parts it doesn't need. Also seeing http:// instead of https:// is starting to feel strange these days, but I do realize both are still used and your tool works with both as it should.
Very nice readme! And nice to see it has a man page. I would leave out the "It's simple:" line because that tends to make less confident people (like new people just learning) blame themselves if they have problems, and then instead of giving you feedback they'll give up and move on.
nodesocket|7 years ago
bechampion|7 years ago
jordache|7 years ago
trimstray|7 years ago
trimstray|7 years ago
trimstray|7 years ago
Thank you for your support!
LinuxBender|7 years ago
[1] - https://github.com/drwetter/testssl.sh
password4321|7 years ago
sametmax|7 years ago
It's a step up from httpie, which is nice to craft requests, but not to check for security.
bloopernova|7 years ago
trimstray|7 years ago
chrisweekly|7 years ago
devinaroy01|7 years ago
[deleted]
unknown|7 years ago
[deleted]