(no title)
throwaway427 | 7 years ago
They are also a body of experts, with more collective knowledge than any other similar body of domain experts in world.
If we believe in institutions of experts who study and make recommendations regarding complex systems, we owe it to the FAA to trust they are charting a prudent course based on the evidence they are gathering and analysis they are doing.
janj|7 years ago
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/13/702908761/why-did-a-boeing-73...
throwaway427|7 years ago
Steve Inskeep rephrases a statement that Goelz makes to make it seem like the FAA is short staffed and that airline compliance is on the honor system.
Goelz then says what he means is that there cannot be an independent FAA inspector in every single corner of a manufacturer or maintenance shop, but by then it's too late because the seed has been planted listeners mind.
So here you are saying the "FAA and NTSB just doesn't have the resources to provide adequate inspections" and that the overall compliance model here is "cooperative self regulation" which... I guess barring the FAA having a 1:1 staff for every employee in the airline industry we are indeed going to have "cooperative self regulation".
peteradio|7 years ago
mikeash|7 years ago
The FAA should be independent but it doesn’t always work that way, and this sort of thing can tip the balance.
anigbrowl|7 years ago
To turn your concluding argument around, what is imprudent about grounding these planes until we have a clearer answer? It's going to cause some economic loss, but this seems like a much lower priority.