[papermill]

In the early 2000s, extreme violence was indexed on search engines. You just had to actively search for it.

The fact that you had to "deep dive" shows that you have to actively search for it so there goes your argument for more regulation.

Also, there is a difference between regulating and banning. Why are you conflating regulation with censorship? Those are two different things.

And why is showing real violence "far from healthy"? One of the reasons why I didn't join the military was seeing what actual violence. I think it is healthy to show what is really happening.

Maybe if we showed everyone the truth rather than PR packaged fake propaganda, we'd be less inclined to support wars ( territorial, drug, etc ).

If your logic is applied, then everything from porn to rap music to movies and literature needs to be banned.

Why do you and a few members of the british government decide what people can or cannot see based solely on your subjective opinions?