top | item 19634225 (no title) fxbl0i | 6 years ago There are many more biographies of males than of females on Wikipedia. Whatever the reason for that might be is up to debate. discuss order hn newest gsich|6 years ago Is this good or bad? Maybe because (assumption here) there are more "relevant" males throughout history? fxbl0i|6 years ago It is not good or bad, it is what it is. Unless biographies of females are actively being suppressed, it is simply irrelevant: they are not being created because nobody cares, literally.
gsich|6 years ago Is this good or bad? Maybe because (assumption here) there are more "relevant" males throughout history? fxbl0i|6 years ago It is not good or bad, it is what it is. Unless biographies of females are actively being suppressed, it is simply irrelevant: they are not being created because nobody cares, literally.
fxbl0i|6 years ago It is not good or bad, it is what it is. Unless biographies of females are actively being suppressed, it is simply irrelevant: they are not being created because nobody cares, literally.
gsich|6 years ago
fxbl0i|6 years ago