top | item 19777799

(no title)

throw_political | 6 years ago

I think if you want to accuse someone of something as serious as rape then you should be prepared to back that up with access to all your data.

discuss

order

ilikehurdles|6 years ago

Why stop at rape accusations? Why not theft, or hit and runs? How about whenever you accuse anyone of any infraction, you have to hand over all your digital data to law enforcement?

Oh I bet you’d never want to be subject to that, yet you want to make a special rule for one kind of accusation.

bloak|6 years ago

One kind of accusation? Do you mean the kind of accusation in which the only evidence that a crime ever took place is the statement of a single witnesses? It doesn't seem unreasonable that you'd want to investigate the credibility of the witness in such cases. I certainly wouldn't stop at rape accusations.

However, I think I'd prefer to see a court, rather than just the police, decide what data should be obtained/requested and how it should be used.

I suspect that in some of these cases the police think it's a hopeless case and are looking for a justification for dropping it. They are perhaps thinking: if this person really wants us to prosecute, then, OK, we'll do it, even if it seems hopeless, but if they won't even fully cooperate by letting us examine their phone then we really can't be bothered any more because we've got lots of better cases to be working on.

wtdata|6 years ago

[deleted]