Why people are acting surprised about this? To me it has been always more than obvious that whatever you say to any of the internet connected “assistants” will be stored and kept as long as the assistant owning company likes.
There's a difference between "it's obvious that they're doing it" (which is only true for people above a certain paranoia line) and "here, look at this proof that they're doing it." There are plenty of things that are obvious to me based on my idea of people's motivations and past behavior, but if I talk to someone lower down on the paranoia spectrum they don't believe me - unless I can point to evidence that they're actually doing it. (A fair thing to ask for, after all.)
It's not obvious from interacting with the device that your voice data leaves, or that there's any permanent record made of your commands. That's something you have to know ahead of time.
What's obvious to tech workers is not obvious to the general population. Most people don't give a second thought to putting all of their communications with friends and family on facebook's unencrypted messenger app (apparently the new version uses E2E encryption but those millions of person-years of chat logs aren't going anywhere).
Exactly what I thought. I imagined it was clear that anything this thing hears can be kept. I bet the terms of use explicitly say that they can, in readable English
This is why we are building 100% offline and private-by-design Voice AI at https://snips.ai, it is free for makers and works in english, french, german, japanese, spanish, italian, and more coming!
I don't see any guarantee that if the platform gets popular and the company acquired, privacy would stay the same. I have seen the same pattern too many times...
Thank you for that. Voice recognition makes for awesome devices, but we dont need every gadget connected to the net sending our words elsewhere. Keep up the good work!
Thanks to the sacrifice of these clueless users (or at least a good part of them are) the era of offline assistants is near looking at what Google has shown recently.
> Thanks to the sacrifice of these clueless users (or at least a good part of them are) the era of offline assistants is near looking at what Google has shown recently.
I think I'm being clueless, but I can't figure out what this sentence means. Is there a typo in it?
I can’t believe that people actually pay for these things... Alexa has always seemed like a gimmick to me. I have an Ecobee smart thermostat that has integrated Alexa, which I promptly disabled after installation.
Me too, but now they are even giving them away. Google has offered me a free Google home several times now. Thank you, I don't need your spy device in my home.
I use my voice controls for 3 big reasons daily:
1) Timers (laundry, cooking, etc)
2) Music
3) Smart home stuff
On the 3rd one, voice actually made the smart home easier. To use a smart light bulb you had to unlock your phone, open an app, login, and do your thing. Now I tell my Alexa/Google to do it and it's super easy.
Also the chromecast integration on Google Home is killer "OK google play pandora on TV" or "Play xyz on youtube on tv"
It's obvious to anyone who spends a moment thinking about it that some portion of what you say remains.
What's less obvious is that they store everything and most definitely index it so it can be used later against you (all it takes is one legal action - separation, police, you name it).
What's further disappointing is that Amazon stores the transcribed text. Which may be incorrect but deemed "truth".
[+] [-] emptybits|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] uzero|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] whatshisface|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sp332|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pault|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] astericks|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tjoff|6 years ago|reply
Just yet another reminder that GDPR is the bare minimum for something like internet to be tolerable.
[+] [-] void445be54d48a|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] oulipo|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] xiphias2|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] phkahler|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] parhamn|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jetbooster|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] j88439h84|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gvand|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JadeNB|6 years ago|reply
I think I'm being clueless, but I can't figure out what this sentence means. Is there a typo in it?
[+] [-] la_barba|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mey|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vbuwivbiu|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jtdev|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kowdermeister|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] NullPrefix|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sschueller|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mathgladiator|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] supergeek133|6 years ago|reply
On the 3rd one, voice actually made the smart home easier. To use a smart light bulb you had to unlock your phone, open an app, login, and do your thing. Now I tell my Alexa/Google to do it and it's super easy.
Also the chromecast integration on Google Home is killer "OK google play pandora on TV" or "Play xyz on youtube on tv"
[+] [-] mrlala|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] dalore|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] djhaskin987|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] r00fus|6 years ago|reply
What's less obvious is that they store everything and most definitely index it so it can be used later against you (all it takes is one legal action - separation, police, you name it).
What's further disappointing is that Amazon stores the transcribed text. Which may be incorrect but deemed "truth".
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] rc_kas|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] waplot|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] snowwolf|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jplayer01|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] markjenkinswpg|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dang|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lostmsu|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sctb|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] justizin|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] iak8god|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cheschire|6 years ago|reply