The interesting thing about this is that the work neatly fitted with existing theory:
> Drozdov et al. observed this isotope effect and found that, compared with the lanthanum hydride samples, the critical temperature in lanthanum deuteride samples is lower by almost exactly the amount predicted by the theory.
So like the article points out:
> From a scientific standpoint, these results suggest that we might be entering a transition from discovering superconductors by empirical rules, intuition or luck to being guided by concrete theoretical predictions.
Whilst this result might require huge pressures, steady progress towards a theory of super-conduction is an exciting thing indeed.
I wouldn't be too optimistic. The theory they are talking about is BCS theory. Most of the other high TC superconductors cannot be explained with it and high TC BCS superconductivity so far requires crazy environments with no clear path to making them easier to use. With the kinds of pressures required to make this happen, it's probably easier to just buy liquid nitrogen and use other materials.
Nobody wants "high temperature" superconductors. They want superconductors at roughly standard temperature and pressure. This is only an advance by the extremely artificial metric of considering temperature only. Ceramic superconductors work at liquid nitrogen temperatures and standard pressure, which is much more accessible.
I'm not raging at ttsda. It is an advance. Of sorts. But not nearly as much as the headline suggests.
Also, the temperature (250 K, -23°C) is a bit chilly to be called “room temperature”. Still, this means you don’t need liquid nitrogen for cooling: a good but standard refrigeration system would be enough (and their insane diamond pressure apparatus, of course).
> From a scientific standpoint, these results suggest that we might be entering a transition from discovering superconductors by empirical rules, intuition or luck to being guided by concrete theoretical predictions.
The sun is also at a temperature of millions of degrees. At these temperatures, there is no such thing as chemical bonds, and so the rules with hydrogen from the article don't apply.
No, it's a plasma. The high pressure in the article is a way of getting to a part of the phase diagram of that particular crystal where the superconducting transition happens at a higher temperature.
"The application claims that a room-temperature superconductor can be built using a wire with an insulator core and an aluminum PZT (lead zirconate titanate) coating deposited by vacuum evaporation with a thickness of the London penetration depth and polarized after deposition.
An electromagnetic coil is circumferentially positioned around the coating such that when the coil is activated with a pulsed current, a non-linear vibration is induced, enabling room temperature superconductivity.
"This concept enables the transmission of electrical power without any losses and exhibits optimal thermal management (no heat dissipation)," according to the patent document, "which leads to the design and development of novel energy generation and harvesting devices with enormous benefits to civilization.""
That’s regular outdoor temperature in a lot of places. I wonder if there is any type of tech that is used in cold climates (or more on cold days) that would benefit from superconductors so they become more efficient when it’s most needed?
Especially since the article says room temperature. I know a lot of people on HN are interested in superconductors but don't necessarily use K frequently if ever.
> Writing in Nature, Drozdov et al.1 report several key results that confirm that, when compressed to pressures of more than one million times Earth’s atmospheric pressure, lanthanum hydride compounds become superconducting at 250 K — a higher temperature than for any other known material.
One million atmospheres is an important detail to leave out of the title.
> "Materials known as superconductors transmit electrical energy with 100% efficiency."
What is the level of (in)efficieny for say power lines? And power cords, etc around the office/house?
That is, of the electricity produced, how much is lost due to how it's transported? Does decentralizing production (e.g., solar panels on your own roof) help in any way?
US grid: losses are 5%. EU grid was in the same ballpark. The wiki page [0] is the source and was pretty much the best summary i could find when i was looking for it a while back. I'd love to read better material about it. Btw, losses seem to include theft. Wonder if much of a thing that still is.
> In general, losses are estimated from the discrepancy between power produced (as reported by power plants) and power sold to the end customers
The bit of heat produced in a power line isn't a huge deal. The more important applications will be in electronics and electromagnets. For instance, it would make nuclear fusion reactors cheaper and easier to build.
Insignificant: EEs can lower the losses by increasing the line voltage [0], at the expense of other challenges (namely taller pylons). It's about 5% over the length of the line.
Consider the other losses:
- Thermal (gas turbine) cycle: 40-60% lost (the big one)
- Transformer loss: 1-2%. You pay this every time you step up/down, so it adds up.
- Capacitive coupling: I dunno, but length dependent. It has to be about the same as Ohmic losses since once it's large you switch to DC lines (and take an Ohmic loss hit from lower V)
- You're house's power factor (which, unlike industrial users, you're not charged for).
[0] in the sixties very large V lines were introduced (0.75 - 1.0 MV ??). They work, but it's not considered worthwhile.
Also, super conductors are limited by the amount of magnetic field, and therefore current they can carry [0] (above that limit they become normal conductors). Lowering T bellow Tc, increasing P increases the amount of current you can carry.
Point is, they're kinda useless for transmission.
[0] MRI magnets are superconducting for the efficiency of superconductors, not for the field strength! The strongest magnets are not made of superconductors but out of copper pipes: electrical conductors with coolant pumped through them!
Smaller than or equal to about 1 percent is fairly normal for high voltage lines, lower voltage lines carry more current for a given amount of power and will experience higher losses.
What's the highest pressure that can be achieved over a useful (1 meter?) distance?
I find it amazing that they managed to scale up cryostats to 1km for superconducting powercables at low temperatures - it would just be interesting if they started scaling up high pressure environments.
I understand that the achievement in question was made in a high pressure environment; but if we get room temperature superconductors (at standard atm pressure), does that mean large scale hover cars/boards deployment will be viable as well [0]?
Room temperature super conductors are in the category of materials that will cause semi-magical transformations in society along side generation techniques that make .001$/KwH electricity, 1$/kwh electricity storage, or >200 gigaPa tensile strength materials for cheap.
[+] [-] PuffinBlue|6 years ago|reply
> Drozdov et al. observed this isotope effect and found that, compared with the lanthanum hydride samples, the critical temperature in lanthanum deuteride samples is lower by almost exactly the amount predicted by the theory.
So like the article points out:
> From a scientific standpoint, these results suggest that we might be entering a transition from discovering superconductors by empirical rules, intuition or luck to being guided by concrete theoretical predictions.
Whilst this result might require huge pressures, steady progress towards a theory of super-conduction is an exciting thing indeed.
[+] [-] djaque|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tigershark|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ttsda|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Zanni|6 years ago|reply
I'm not raging at ttsda. It is an advance. Of sorts. But not nearly as much as the headline suggests.
[+] [-] saagarjha|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] skunkworker|6 years ago|reply
lanthanum hydride @ 250K at > 1 million atm.
It's still very impressive though.
[+] [-] taneq|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baq|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bhaak|6 years ago|reply
That would be an exciting development.
[+] [-] acd|6 years ago|reply
The suns central pressure is 2.5*10^11 bar according to nasa.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun
https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/sunfact.html
[+] [-] skykooler|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] madhadron|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adrianN|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Nano2rad|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yo1|6 years ago|reply
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-s...
"The application claims that a room-temperature superconductor can be built using a wire with an insulator core and an aluminum PZT (lead zirconate titanate) coating deposited by vacuum evaporation with a thickness of the London penetration depth and polarized after deposition.
An electromagnetic coil is circumferentially positioned around the coating such that when the coil is activated with a pulsed current, a non-linear vibration is induced, enabling room temperature superconductivity.
"This concept enables the transmission of electrical power without any losses and exhibits optimal thermal management (no heat dissipation)," according to the patent document, "which leads to the design and development of novel energy generation and harvesting devices with enormous benefits to civilization.""
[+] [-] gwbas1c|6 years ago|reply
That's about -10F, or -23C.
(And it would make a lot more sense to put that in the article. Most of us don't "think" in Kelvin.)
[+] [-] nine_k|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] alkonaut|6 years ago|reply
Oh - it has to be at 1atm and -20 of course...
[+] [-] penagwin|6 years ago|reply
Especially since the article says room temperature. I know a lot of people on HN are interested in superconductors but don't necessarily use K frequently if ever.
[+] [-] apo|6 years ago|reply
One million atmospheres is an important detail to leave out of the title.
[+] [-] chiefalchemist|6 years ago|reply
What is the level of (in)efficieny for say power lines? And power cords, etc around the office/house?
That is, of the electricity produced, how much is lost due to how it's transported? Does decentralizing production (e.g., solar panels on your own roof) help in any way?
[+] [-] Faark|6 years ago|reply
> In general, losses are estimated from the discrepancy between power produced (as reported by power plants) and power sold to the end customers
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission#Lo...
[+] [-] skosch|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ben_w|6 years ago|reply
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission#...
[+] [-] sfasfsafd|6 years ago|reply
Consider the other losses:
- Thermal (gas turbine) cycle: 40-60% lost (the big one) - Transformer loss: 1-2%. You pay this every time you step up/down, so it adds up. - Capacitive coupling: I dunno, but length dependent. It has to be about the same as Ohmic losses since once it's large you switch to DC lines (and take an Ohmic loss hit from lower V) - You're house's power factor (which, unlike industrial users, you're not charged for).
[0] in the sixties very large V lines were introduced (0.75 - 1.0 MV ??). They work, but it's not considered worthwhile.
[+] [-] sfasfsafd|6 years ago|reply
Point is, they're kinda useless for transmission.
[0] MRI magnets are superconducting for the efficiency of superconductors, not for the field strength! The strongest magnets are not made of superconductors but out of copper pipes: electrical conductors with coolant pumped through them!
[+] [-] jacquesm|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] krageon|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] trebligdivad|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] oh_teh_meows|6 years ago|reply
[0] https://youtu.be/PXHczjOg06w
[+] [-] wolfram74|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adrianN|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stevespang|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]