I'm so glad I grew up during a time when you didn't have to worry about every single second of your life potentially being captured on video and used for some nefarious purpose.
I can't imagine being a kid in this type of environment. Then again, many of the kids who will be unwillingly subjected to this probably aren't informed enough to understand the potential long-term consequences of pervasive surveillance, which makes it all the more evil.
It's appalling that they spent $1.4 million (so far) on this rather than putting the money towards more useful things like teacher salaries or after-school programs. Maybe if they improved the overall school experience they wouldn't need to monitor the kids like prisoners?
The stated aims of the system are easily covertly expanded (and there is ample history to indicate that will happen) to turn the school into a panopticon, building a social graph and personality profile of kids as they grow up.
If the kids are allowed to know their "social scores" many of them will compete to get the lowest to be cool. I kind of hope the administrators make this mistake. It would give me great Schadenfreude.
It's already against the rules to cover your face in many schools. Besides, if the system can't recognize you, you will be marked as absent - so the punishment for defeating the surveillance system is the same as the punishment for breaking the rule it's intended to enforce. Those teenagers are dependent on the civic involvement of adults, they can't save themselves.
Because children and adolescents aren't people, they often have surveillance and control technologies tested on them. And when the surveillance and control technologies significantly increase school violence (can you name a school shooting at a school that didn't have cameras?), they conclude that more technology is needed to surveil and control. I imagine it's a booming business.
We need to invent a category of property rights for the results of such testing against non-consenting populations. That would create an economic incentive for lawyers to do what they do best.
We already have legal precedent for paying reparations for undisclosed tests against civilians.
Lockport is an old factory town on the Erie Canal, not far from Buffalo and Niagara Falls. The population is about 20,000 people. North of the city is orchards and farmland, south are the outer suburbs of Buffalo. It's not a place known for high tech, nor is it known for high municipal spending.
The backstory of how this came about would surely be interesting.
A plausible story is that Lockport is the county seat of Niagara County, NY, which has three land (bridge) crossings with Canada, and therefore has significant USCIS presence throughout the county. I can imagine a joint task force involving county law enforcement and USCIS. Most schools in NY State have armed police (“school resource officer”) present. They probably all go to the same sporting events, drink at the same pubs.
Nothing like a refreshing beverage and discussing pervasive surveillance technology for the youth of America.
Slightly confusing how although the article's opening paragraph currently says "...an explicit order" from the state education department, it goes on to quote it later where it can be seen to be just a recommendation.
Did the parents approve the use of the photos by a 3rd party? Were the parents advised of the policies around data retention and data destruction? Will this data remain in the system after the children are adults?
No problems from me. NY schools already have a security guard on duty that watches everyone coming and going through the front door. Its not always easy job, anything that can help them would be great.
radcon|6 years ago
I can't imagine being a kid in this type of environment. Then again, many of the kids who will be unwillingly subjected to this probably aren't informed enough to understand the potential long-term consequences of pervasive surveillance, which makes it all the more evil.
It's appalling that they spent $1.4 million (so far) on this rather than putting the money towards more useful things like teacher salaries or after-school programs. Maybe if they improved the overall school experience they wouldn't need to monitor the kids like prisoners?
ErikVandeWater|6 years ago
deogeo|6 years ago
To me this looks like an openly hostile act.
ErikVandeWater|6 years ago
beenBoutIT|6 years ago
grecy|6 years ago
At least, I sure hope they will.
whatshisface|6 years ago
unknown|6 years ago
[deleted]
saagarjha|6 years ago
otakucode|6 years ago
gumby|6 years ago
Nowadays it will.
quickben|6 years ago
walterbell|6 years ago
We already have legal precedent for paying reparations for undisclosed tests against civilians.
ilamont|6 years ago
The backstory of how this came about would surely be interesting.
souterrain|6 years ago
Nothing like a refreshing beverage and discussing pervasive surveillance technology for the youth of America.
salawat|6 years ago
The time has come to teach your chilluns the virtues of laser pointers, spray paint, and civil disobedience.
It won't take long, I guarantee you.
paulvs|6 years ago
misiti3780|6 years ago
LinuxBender|6 years ago
rb808|6 years ago
debacle|6 years ago
Nope.
saagarjha|6 years ago
kwhitefoot|6 years ago
prisonBYdefault|6 years ago
[deleted]
rgrieselhuber|6 years ago
unknown|6 years ago
[deleted]
daodedickinson|6 years ago
spraak|6 years ago
kevin_thibedeau|6 years ago
driverdan|6 years ago