[fusl]

> For the downvoters, please just link here the proof if you disagree.

https://wasabi.com/

[snazz]

How can they possibly guarantee eleven nines? Considering I’ve never heard of this company and they offer such crazy-sounding improvements over the big three, it feels like there should be a catch.

[ignoramous]

11 9s isn't uncommon. AWS S3 does 11 9s (upto 16 9s with cross region replication?) for data durability, too. AFAIK, AWS published papers about their use of formal methods to ascertain bugs from other parts of the system didn't creep in to affect durability/availability guarantees: https://blog.acolyer.org/2014/11/24/use-of-formal-methods-at...

This is a pretty neat and concise read on ObjectStorage in-use at BigTech, in case you're interested: https://maisonbisson.com/post/object-storage-prior-art-and-l...

[johnmaguire2013]

For data durability? I believe some AWS offerings also have an SLA of eleven 9's of data durability.

[sascha_sl]

11 9s of durability, barely two 9s of availability

I'm sure that's okay if you do bulk processing / time-independent analysis, but don't host production assets on wasabi.

[StreamBright]

I was asking numbers of reliability, durability and availability for a service like S3. What does wasabi has to do with that?