top | item 20161445

DJI RoboMaster S1

127 points| dakrisht | 6 years ago |dji.com | reply

109 comments

order
[+] hurrdurr2|6 years ago|reply
Making the offensive component a central design element is... interesting. They could have designed a robot for kids like what anki did but.. this is what they came up with.
[+] jamestimmins|6 years ago|reply
It's perhaps notable that Anki went out of business.

Given the popularity of games like Fortnite, the shooting dynamic seems somewhat inevitable. They may as well shoot at other toy robots and learn to program in the process.

[+] Lazare|6 years ago|reply
I can only conclude they've actually met a child, unlike the Anki designers then. :)
[+] usaphp|6 years ago|reply
From my experience companies try to design way too friendly and childish robots for kids. Kids at age 8-12 don’t like anki looking robots, they are not cool at all, maybe that’s the reason anki went out of business
[+] lnsru|6 years ago|reply
I can imagine, that some primitive gripper is many times more expensive than this offensive component. With a gripper robot must be also bigger and wider as well as more expensive.

As I can see in my home country (ex Soviet Union), parents have no problems when little kids play with guns, tanks or planes. Germans, for example, avoid this. I have mixed feelings, I love peace, but the guns also exist in this world.

[+] foxylad|6 years ago|reply
Really limiting their demographic though. A little thought and they could have have had all the Candy Crush kids too.
[+] adultSwim|6 years ago|reply
is... a reflection of where this technology came from
[+] throwaway66666|6 years ago|reply
The fact that DJI releases an educational robot for kids that has a working cannon feels super icky from my western perspective. In China do they think it's a great idea? Is the culture gap that big, or is there another reason?

Also, how long until someone recreates the famous square scene with a lego character and 3 of these?

EDIT: This video from the promo page where it is hunting down a child - https://www1.djicdn.com/assets/uploads/v/1b34c0e069531a08639...

This would have been great without the cannon, with the cannon it feels... off.

[+] mikl|6 years ago|reply
Damn, a younger version of me would have loved this thing. The remote-controlled cars we had in the 90's were downright primitive in comparison.
[+] cbg0|6 years ago|reply
Those primitive RC cars weren't $499 though.
[+] xchaotic|6 years ago|reply
My kids went through Sphero, Mindstorms and a couple of other robots where you can program them in Scratch and similar. To me such a toy would have been a godsend. They got bored pretty quickly.

Another issue is that gimbal adds to video quality but also to cost.

Finally with the hype, I was expecting a nice ready to fly FPV drone.

So I'm a bit meh about this toy.

[+] Mauronic1|6 years ago|reply
Why do you think they would not get bored? Also, what do you think about the price?
[+] sneak|6 years ago|reply
DJI is amazing. They sell their drone IMU+RF module separately to make your own drones, and their new 4K Osmo Pocket comes with me everywhere I go. Few companies are making such innovative hardware.
[+] ex3ndr|6 years ago|reply
So they are showing how this robots shoot each other and then they show where you can point to a child to follow (or shoot?)...
[+] yardie|6 years ago|reply
I like it. Wish it came with an arm instead of a turret. We have a Parrot Mambo in our home. The turret was used for a few days and then removed. It added a lot of bulk and halved the flight time.
[+] rosege|6 years ago|reply
This website has a major flaw. When I click the buy button it says not available in your country. I was thinking about getting this for my nephew who lives in the USA while I live in Australia. I know I'm obviously a small percentage that is outside USA that could buy and get it delivered to a local address but it still seems crazy not to even allow that.

I know I could vpn it but I don't think that should be necessary.

[+] rendx|6 years ago|reply
You can change the country at the top right corner. At least this worked for me to get a price tag and the option to order.
[+] sjcao|6 years ago|reply
It might be a legal issue instead of the small market. the robot shoot water ball so it might violate Australia law. just my 2 cents.
[+] deskamess|6 years ago|reply
To mimic your use case, I went through a trial run and it does let you enter a non US billing address (Australia was a drop down).
[+] Tepix|6 years ago|reply
So, how about a DIY variant of this?

- Start with a DonkeyCar with Jetson Nano

- add mecanum wheels (why not three instead of four?)

- add a weapon or laser pointer or whatever

On the other hand, do we really want to push gamification of autonomous weapon systems?

[+] JustFinishedBSG|6 years ago|reply
DJI taking the time to write a page for the S1 in my language only to at the very end tell me "Not available in your region" is toying with my emotions and heartbreaking
[+] xiphias2|6 years ago|reply
You can always do dropshipping...it's sucks, but us non-US people are always second class citizens of the world.
[+] jeannekamikaze|6 years ago|reply
Interesting how an educational robot project/competition always needs to involve the careful exercising of ballistics against a target. Descartes clearly got it all wrong and should have instead formulated his proposition as "I fire ma lazerz, therefore I am". By that definition, the singularity is clearly near.
[+] yeldarb|6 years ago|reply
Looks like a cooler version of the AWS DeepRacer mixed with an old LEGO MindStorm kit.
[+] jpdb|6 years ago|reply
I know this is a yet-to-be released product and it says Python is supported, but does anyone know if it is possible to install 3rd party libraries and interact with the filesystem?

Interested in installing a webserver like flask on here.

[+] Mauronic1|6 years ago|reply
It will be interesting to see how open it is but DJIs first educational offering (Tello) and other products don't go very far in that regard.
[+] darepublic|6 years ago|reply
This looks pretty damn cool and I'd like to try it. But weird that the western media hasn't picked up this story in light of all their coverage on China stealing IP...
[+] PanMan|6 years ago|reply
What does the "gun" shoot? It seems laser, but then how does the target in the movie (which seems to be paper) fall over?
[+] sjcao|6 years ago|reply
it's some kind of small ball, need to absorb water for 2+ hours before use.
[+] willart4food|6 years ago|reply
why this?

> To comply with local laws and regulations, the RoboMaster S1 will not be sold in Washington, D.C. or North Dakota.

[+] Mauronic1|6 years ago|reply
My American girlfriend's immediate response: seems militaristic and violent.

My daughter was turned off from robotics at a young age. She joined firstego league and there was a ton of domineering "boy energy" in her school. She enjoyed creating and personalizing the robots in unique ways, the boys wanted "to win".

This is what happens when you have a bunch of dudes designing educational robot toys.

[+] langitbiru|6 years ago|reply
You are posing an interesting assumption. Your premise is girls and boys are "biologically" different in this robotics context. Your words: "the boys wanted 'to win'", "She enjoyed creating and personalizing the robots".

If we accept your premise to be true, then we must cater to the girls so robotics can be more inclusive. Again your words: "creating and personalizing the robots in unique ways". Maybe DJI can provide robotics which is less violent, catered for girls. I don't know, maybe something like Baymax, or Wall-E.

The other side of coin is we reject your premise. Boys and girls have no differences. Boys want to win. Girls want to win also. If this alternative premise is true, then either we must push the girls to be more aggressive (want to win) or discourage the boys who are aggressive (want to win).

I am interested in other people's opinion about this. No, I don't have answer for this question.

[+] akerl_|6 years ago|reply
I’m more concerned by the idea that wanting “to win” is “boy energy”. Why should we persist the idea that wanting to win is a boy thing, and wanting to create/personalize is (as implied by your comment) a girl thing?
[+] dgzl|6 years ago|reply
I'm curious, since you know your daughter's personality (and those of little girls in general) better than I do, how would the game be designed such that they'd be more interested? Keep in mind this is coming from a company known for making high quality drones.
[+] bubblewrap|6 years ago|reply
Get your daughter a different toy, then, and let the boys enjoy their battles.