Even if you keep it for decades it's got millennia left to be someone else's trash and landfill, so it's still worth substituting something that biodegrades.
What do you base that on? Lego has plenty of small individual sets that get played with by kids, broken apart, bits go missing and eventually they get binned.
The first lego sets I had are still great. They are more basic and allow more open play than the current sets in my opinion.
The lego pieces today feel a bit better and are easier to connect and pull apart. But I do not like the way Legos transitioned into Collector-Pieces/Merchandizing toys. There's just too much of it and most of them limit your fantasy.
Yes, but little pieces end up inevitably lost. And for a company as big as Lego, it becomes a moral responsibility to look for solutions - even if each customer only loses one tiny block per year, that's millions of little indestructible plastic pieces. But it would be ideal if they would biodegrade in certain conditions like after 20 years under the sea.
I don't really get the point, if you make bio plastic that lasts as long as normal plastic then won't it have the same effect on our plastic waste problem. Also, it is not like taking some oil out of the earth together with the tons of oil that are taken out for fuel (probably from a thickness that isn't really used for much else) will have a worse effects on our environment than clearing out enormous pieces of land to grow all these plants.
[+] [-] cosmodisk|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] extropy|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] benologist|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tonyedgecombe|6 years ago|reply
I’m not sure what we will do with it when they pass, it has little or no value.
Perhaps it would make sense to recycle it.
[+] [-] Hedja|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] magic_beans|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zubspace|6 years ago|reply
The lego pieces today feel a bit better and are easier to connect and pull apart. But I do not like the way Legos transitioned into Collector-Pieces/Merchandizing toys. There's just too much of it and most of them limit your fantasy.
[+] [-] toper-centage|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jacquesm|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] desuyone|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tracker1|6 years ago|reply
1) it makes them look like they care about green earth stuff, not saying they don't, but the marketing image is priceless.
2) it's potentially valuable IP that can be licensed to other companies, even where it doesn't work for lego, it might be a great fit more broadly.
3) Having it wear down more quickly means more responsible waste, also it ensures the product may instead of lasting decades, only last a few years.
4) Eventually crude oil will run out, and even before that will get much more costly to use as source material.
[+] [-] specialist|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] byron_fast|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] FredDollen|6 years ago|reply