(no title)
systemtrigger | 6 years ago
They're:
Spot I
Spot II
...
is not quite correct. The AKC does not assign a number to the first one.Open the Dog Name Check [1]. Pick a breed, enter a unique dog name, and the page will report it is available. Now pick a semi-unique combination ("Shih Tzu" + "King") and the page will say "The name chosen has been used previously, but may be used with the following change: King XXXVII." This implies the first person to pick "King" got "King" and the second person got "King II."
One dog per breed can have the name Spot/King/etc. But the AKC is a rent-seeking monopoly and 6 Roman numerals is short enough to still appear somewhat exclusive.
wavefunction|6 years ago
I don't really have a... dog in this hunt... but anyone could start up their own dog registry with whatever rules they want. I don't believe the AKC has preempted competition via regulatory capture, for example.
microtherion|6 years ago
LocalH|6 years ago
panopticon|6 years ago
hirsin|6 years ago
Svip|6 years ago
So grandparent's point isn't that it's off by one, but that the first name is inaccurate for the time it was rewarded. Although, considering we are viewing it _after the fact_, i.e. now that more dogs are called the same, I think it's fair to add the "I" at the end.
everdev|6 years ago
tobiasSoftware|6 years ago
Taniwha|6 years ago