It seems like OP just thinks Jefferson has written some "extremely valid criticism" of central banking, from before the US had the system. Who knows? I think central banking is probably fine and cryptocurrencies are stupid and I don't see where the appeal to authority is.
Your thoughts are clear and interesting. It appears we've always had a ratio of 1, 2a and 2b with some collapses or perhaps even more illusive is the [slow] migration. Like paper gold, man-made diamonds or the private entity stops acting on behalf of the government and ends up owning it.
lisper|6 years ago
trentmb|6 years ago
Because they thought Jeffersons thoughts on the matter were relevant.
> Why not Arglebargle?
Because I know what that word means.
> Or me?
Because "lisper central banks" doesn't produce any meaningful results in a search engine.
> I have musings on the topic of central banks, would you like to hear them?
Sure.
tomjakubowski|6 years ago
hokus|6 years ago