[cujic9]

I've noticed a recent uptick in news promoting the cruelty of China toward its citizens.

I struggle to figure out how much is true, and how much is an alternate reality created by my government. (I'm in the USA, and anger towards China definitely benefits the Republican Party / Trump administration.)

[beloch]

I can't blame you for being suspicious, but in this case we have both a significant anniversary of Tianamen Square and a major protest in Hong Kong that are probably driving news sources.

You should probably look at the issue behind this protest. Currently, Hong Kong and mainland China have separate, independent judicial systems. HK's is a fusion of Chinese law and British common law. The HK government recently tabled a bill that many feared would make HK citizens subject to mainland Chinese law, effectively ending the "one country, two systems" policy. This is a pretty big deal, and I don't think these protestors required foreign meddling to fill the streets.

On the other hand, lots of significant stuff goes on in the world while U.S. news sources ignore them and cover domestic fluff. An event like the current protest might show up in news, but then quickly disappear instead of being dragged out into story after story as "BIG NEWS". Is this showing up as big news in U.S. news sources because of the antagonism between the U.S. (and most of the rest of the world) and China right now? It's certainly possible. Even so, I think what is happening in HK right now is significant, and worthy of attention.

[beaner]

This is silly. As a US citizen with the internet, you have easy access to foreign press as well. Just go look at that and see how much of an alternate reality we're not in regarding this topic.

[cujic9]

On a side note, I did some more digging, and:

The Agnelli family is the largest shareholder in the Economist. The Rothschilds are second largest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economist_Group#Ownership

Also, as of 2015:

> Pearson’s move to sell most of its stake to Exor, the investment company run by the Agnellis, upholds a tradition of dynastic ownership of media assets. Rupert Murdoch owns News UK, which publishes the Sun and the Times, the Barclay brothers own the Telegraph, and the Rothermere family controls the Daily Mail titles. Overseas, the Sulzberger family owns the New York Times, the Springers control huge chunks of German media and the Bonnier family owns a large publishing portfolio in Sweden. Newspapers have long been the playthings of wealthy media barons who are seduced by the access and influence they bring.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/aug/15/economist-beco...

Just because press is foreign doesn't mean it's objective or independent of politics. News is a business, and just like any business, the owners make decisions based on their beliefs.

[cujic9]

Yes. I view posting on HN and seeing the response as one way to help uncover the truth for myself.

[sergiomattei]

Not sure why you were downvoted, because this is an interesting thing to note.

I don't know who it benefits, but it's important to question everything in this day and age.

[helen___keller]

For what it's worth, there's a substantial amount of anti-CCP propaganda out there (although I doubt it's straight from US gov but who knows). By propaganda I mean QAnon-tier nonsense.

I've had the great pleasure of hearing about it from certain relatives on a semi regular basis. One week you hear that trump will have the CCP dismantled within a month, the next week you hear there's going to be mass starvation in China and we need to call relatives (in mainland China) and tell them to stock up on food while they can.

The common theme is that Wang Qishan (not Xi, notably) is some kind of corrupt Boogeyman who controls China, wallstreet, etc etc

[randomsearch]

If someone’s coordinating the US media, they’re also doing the same to high quality UK outlets too. The FT and Economist have been publishing a lot of stories that are very critical of the Chinese government.

I agree it’s good to question. What do we think may not be true? I can fact-check HK situation via personal sources to some extent. The other stories that I’ve seen recently are those about re-education camps for (reported) hundreds of thousands of Muslims in the country, and the campaign against Huawei’s involvement in 5G and other projects.

I noticed the “2 million people on the streets stat” wrt HK was met by the government with a number in the tens of thousands. That’s a ridiculous discrepancy; at least one party is outright lying. Perhaps fact checking that stat would be a good indicator of how much to trust the Chinese media vs the protestors or western press.

[MikeHolman]

Just a few weeks ago was the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, and now you have 2 million people protesting in Hong Kong.

I think it's mostly that there's a lot of newsworthy events going on in China right now.

[nsonnad]

I'm the reporter on this article. I can tell you that the US government did not pay me or pressure me in any way. And other journalists who worked on this piece are in fact Chinese. Skepticism is healthy but don't let it get in the way of learning the truth.

[fiachamp]

I was in Shanghai last year and can confirm that China is far more authoritarian than even the US under Trump. Cameras every 400 Meters on the street, digital ads showing photos of debtors,etc. Great food, architecture, and ancient culture though. Overall made me appreciate the 'freedom' of the US a lot more, since I've been pretty bearish since 2016

[seanmcdirmid]

Anger against China in trade benefits Republicans and Trump. Anger against China in human rights does not, because then they would have to explain their friendliness to Saudi Arabia and other countries. Trump hasn’t chimed in on the HK protests much at all as far as I can tell, he just doesn’t care.