I thought this business has technology cycles. It's just that AMD has missed a few and now Intel is at the mid-stage of it's current architecture. Wouldn't they be naturally back on top in a few years while AMD retools a new architecture family? I don't get the "intel is done for" reasoning. Cutting pricing on a product-line that is in mid to late life-cycle is expected in most other businesses including technology.There are other arguments wrt Intel not being fabless that I get but those are not the same thing.
wmf|6 years ago
johnvanommen|6 years ago
Now the situation has flipped, and Intel is years behind.
wickoff|6 years ago
qzw|6 years ago
pixelpoet|6 years ago
My understanding is that Intel's manufacturing lead is basically gone now, and with Zen 2 so too will their uarch lead (IPC, AVX throughput, ...) disappear.
Sohcahtoa82|6 years ago
You can tell who the AMD fanboys are because they keep repeating this line even though it gets pointed out every time that the different fabs measure density differently and that Intel's 10 nm process is on par with TSMC's 7 nm.