top | item 20304070 (no title) BigChiefSmokem | 6 years ago Theres a good reason why we shouldn’t use direct democracy and the Founders where very clear about that. discuss order hn newest spease|6 years ago You mean the concern that the people might elect a demagogue...? aey|6 years ago Yes, the concern is that in a direct democracy demagogues will be elected far more often and with far more extreme views.Bicameral parliamentary systems are even less prone to this since the prime minister is elected by the ruling coalition. But they have other problems. Fjolsvith|6 years ago After the next 6 years of "America being greater", I am sure that your concern will definitely be a sticking point to returning to a majority rule election system. onemoresoop|6 years ago All these tools from the founding fathers were abused and misused. a3n|6 years ago 1. All systems can be gamed.2. All systems will be gamed.3. The people are not the players, they are the chips.
spease|6 years ago You mean the concern that the people might elect a demagogue...? aey|6 years ago Yes, the concern is that in a direct democracy demagogues will be elected far more often and with far more extreme views.Bicameral parliamentary systems are even less prone to this since the prime minister is elected by the ruling coalition. But they have other problems. Fjolsvith|6 years ago After the next 6 years of "America being greater", I am sure that your concern will definitely be a sticking point to returning to a majority rule election system.
aey|6 years ago Yes, the concern is that in a direct democracy demagogues will be elected far more often and with far more extreme views.Bicameral parliamentary systems are even less prone to this since the prime minister is elected by the ruling coalition. But they have other problems.
Fjolsvith|6 years ago After the next 6 years of "America being greater", I am sure that your concern will definitely be a sticking point to returning to a majority rule election system.
onemoresoop|6 years ago All these tools from the founding fathers were abused and misused. a3n|6 years ago 1. All systems can be gamed.2. All systems will be gamed.3. The people are not the players, they are the chips.
a3n|6 years ago 1. All systems can be gamed.2. All systems will be gamed.3. The people are not the players, they are the chips.
spease|6 years ago
aey|6 years ago
Bicameral parliamentary systems are even less prone to this since the prime minister is elected by the ruling coalition. But they have other problems.
Fjolsvith|6 years ago
onemoresoop|6 years ago
a3n|6 years ago
2. All systems will be gamed.
3. The people are not the players, they are the chips.