[carboy]

India does not have a water issue, they have a population issue, but it’s really hard to mange the population, so natural resources are being consumed beyond sustainability.

This problem is not confined to India, it’s a problem with humanity. Nature is working on a correction.

[chewz]

This is one point of view.

You could also say that resources of India had been depleted by greed, overexploatation and the lack of proper governanace. You can't run a multimilion city on borewells and groundwater - the government should had built proper infrastructure - pipelines, reservoirs, water meters, sewage treatment plans etc.

In a way India is a minature to the entire world.

[bobosha]

I beg to differ, India's population density is comparable to many Western European countries. They a problem of population distribution. Like many developing nations, populations cluster in large cities leading to pressures on resources.

[thaumasiotes]

> India's population density is comparable to many Western European countries.

I went down worldpopulationreview.com's list; I'll post my list annotated with country size as a reply to this comment.

Findings:

India, the country, is #28. It has essentially equal population density to the Netherlands (#29, in Europe!), while being a modest 87 times larger. Belgium (#33) has only slightly less density, and India is merely 102 times bigger.

The next European country down is England at #50. It's much closer to the size of India -- 8% as large -- and has two-thirds the density.

Pakistan is #55; it's about four times the size of England with comparable density.

#59 is Germany; it's less than half the size of Pakistan with comparable density. Luxembourg and Liechtenstein, who you might have thought would have super-high density, are equal to Germany. (Monaco and Vatican City really do have super-high density.)

The only other country-sized European countries in the top 70 are Switzerland and Italy, #68 and #69. They have half the density of India. Italy is a tenth of India's size. Switzerland is slightly larger than the Netherlands.

Bangladesh, by the way, is #12, with more than double the density of India (in about 1/20 of the space).

So I can't agree that India's population density is comparable to "many Western European countries". It's comparable to a couple of diminutive European countries. Equal density over 100 times the area is not what you would expect; it's something very unusual about India.

In fact, we can just compare the regions directly. Europe has 743 million people in 10 million square kilometers of land for an average density of 74.3 people per square km. India (including Pakistan and Bangladesh) has 1740 million people in 4 million square km, for an average density of over 400 people per square km (roughly equal to the density of India the country, which makes sense), about 6 times the figure for Europe.

[chmod775]

Most european countries have highly cultivated land and are industrialized through and through. It might go faster nowadays, but it took them hundreds of years to get there. Turning the middle of nowhere into arable land doesn't happen over night in any case.

This makes them able to efficiently provide for their population with the land they have available. India has some way to go in that respect.

This is not accounting for differences in geography or resources - like water - that are directly limited unless you want to build infrastructure for artificial water purification too.

[gingabriska]

Not all land is livable. And more land becomes livable if the population residing on them have more resources.

Many places in Scandinavia go below -20c and people live there because they've means to heat up the spaces where they live.

People are surviving in dessert where there is no natural water because they've built sea water planets.

[mrcode007]

https://pudding.cool/2018/10/city_3d/

[Ayesh]

I suppose it's more of the density than the population. India is massive by all measurements, but west and east sides are completely different. In the west, you have Mumbai, a city full of dust, slums, and millions of people riding trains in a single evening, all fighting for resources.

East side, is full of greenery, rainforest, and a peaceful living with hardly any population compared to west.

[jussij]

There is no doubt population an economic growth will be putting pressure on the water situation in India.

But at least for this year, the climate also seems to have played a very big part in the issue:

https://weather.com/en-IN/india/monsoon/news/2019-06-03-indi...

The Drought Early Warning System (DEWS) revealed that more than 42% of the country’s area is abnormally dry, which is 6% more than that of the previous year.

... as many as 26 out of 36 meteorological subdivisions in India have recorded deficit rainfall. This is the second driest pre-monsoon that the country has witnessed ever since 1954.

[chmod775]

> but it’s really hard to mange the population

China managed in a similar situation. I think it may be harder to fight people for resources, or just reducing their resource use, than making sure they are never born.