Wait so the defense's case centers around the idea that Carreyrou had too much influence over regulators by providing extensive evidence, witness testimony, and analysis by objective third party specialists? Is this for real? By "eager to break a story" do they mean a kind of eagerness that results in a painstaking effort to build a thorough case that has been scrutinized by the public and media alike? This, like Theranos' tech, can't possibly be viable.
The best defense they can offer is that Carreyrou was too good of a journalist. I hope to god the jury is not lenient here in the face of overwhelmingly damning evidence. This was a matter of defrauding not just investors, but putting lives at risk and ruining careers in the process.
Ruining careers? Not always. Mona Ramamurthy, former head of Theranos HR and Sunny Balwani's right hand woman, was one of the most egregious offenders and later got a job as senior HR at google. Google was probably most impressed by her treatment of the H1Bs at Theranos, since they have the same needs.
[+] [-] crsv|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] microtherion|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] banachtarski|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amznthrowaway2|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] algaeontoast|6 years ago|reply
Has info been released as to whether or not all of Holme's finances will be frozen prior to trial?
[+] [-] thrwayxyz|6 years ago|reply
Hi Doug.
[+] [-] notus|6 years ago|reply