[unictek]

Careful with Deno, performance is still low: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3397140/48649635-8...

[inglor]

That's just FUD through a synthetic benchmark by the person who wrote uWS after he approached Ryan and Ryan wouldn't do everything he asked for...

[unictek]

Running a local benchmark to compare Node.js and Deno gave me the same magnitude of performance difference. I like the concepts behind Deno but the performance should stay a top priority. Even more for a new technology that is looking for future adoption. If Deno gets faster than Node.js, I adopt it. If it stays 5x less performant than Node.js, I skip it.

[PudgePacket]

That bench has deno at 0.2, it's now at 0.10, though I have no idea how much performance work has been done.

Performance should improve over time, there's no fundamental reason from what I understand that it shouldn't be as fast or faster than node.

node has had 10 years of work and performance effort from so many people and organisations.