(no title)
hjk05
|
6 years ago
Shaving 20minutes off of a trip that takes more than an hour is not comparable to going from horses to cars. Current routes and travel times are perfectly fine when you ask the consumers, they just want it affordable. No one wants to take the train when flying costs almost the same.
ghaff|6 years ago
Sure they do if it's more pleasant. In the US, the train on the Northeast Corridor takes maybe a bit longer depending upon the specifics than flying and costs in the same ballpark (depending on whether Acela or regular coach, parking, etc.) And it's at capacity at peak times.
When you're not talking big money in the scheme of things, many will take whatever mode of transportation is most convenient and comfortable--especially for business travel.
If you really are very price sensitive, you're probably taking Megabus or something similar.
oposa|6 years ago
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail_in_Europe#/med...
peanutgal2600|6 years ago
A fast train is always a healthier and more pleasant experience than an airplane. Hint: trains have windows.
Disclosure: I'm a private pilot and have lifetime status on two major carriers. I still hate air travel.