top | item 20544402 (no title) mrmondo | 6 years ago I’m not necessarily discounting the results however I found it odd that the primary source didn’t state the sample size (or maybe I missed it)? https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/oby.22518 discuss order hn newest traek|6 years ago You missed it, right in the abstract :-)> Methods> Eleven adults with overweight practiced both early time‐restricted feeding (eTRF) (eating from 8 am to 2 pm) and a control schedule (eating from 8 am to 8 pm) for 4 days each. mrmondo|6 years ago Oh did I - whoops!That quote doesn’t give the sample size (number of people studied and in each group) though? load replies (1)
traek|6 years ago You missed it, right in the abstract :-)> Methods> Eleven adults with overweight practiced both early time‐restricted feeding (eTRF) (eating from 8 am to 2 pm) and a control schedule (eating from 8 am to 8 pm) for 4 days each. mrmondo|6 years ago Oh did I - whoops!That quote doesn’t give the sample size (number of people studied and in each group) though? load replies (1)
mrmondo|6 years ago Oh did I - whoops!That quote doesn’t give the sample size (number of people studied and in each group) though? load replies (1)
traek|6 years ago
> Methods
> Eleven adults with overweight practiced both early time‐restricted feeding (eTRF) (eating from 8 am to 2 pm) and a control schedule (eating from 8 am to 8 pm) for 4 days each.
mrmondo|6 years ago
That quote doesn’t give the sample size (number of people studied and in each group) though?