top | item 20584825 (no title) sadris | 6 years ago And how many innocent people were convicted based on false positives?How many guilty people were convicted based on true positives? discuss order hn newest Jill_the_Pill|6 years ago These are not comparable. The first must be zero, and the second should be "as many as possible while keeping the first at zero." sadris|6 years ago It must be zero? What if that resulted in 50% of murderers getting away? load replies (3) DrGrX|6 years ago Trying to eliminate false positives at the expense of letting criminals go free is a staple of western criminal law dating back to 1760s. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone%27s_ratio RHSeeger|6 years ago Convicted isn't the right metric. Accusing someone of some crimes (generally anything sexually related or child related) is enough to ruin their life.
Jill_the_Pill|6 years ago These are not comparable. The first must be zero, and the second should be "as many as possible while keeping the first at zero." sadris|6 years ago It must be zero? What if that resulted in 50% of murderers getting away? load replies (3)
sadris|6 years ago It must be zero? What if that resulted in 50% of murderers getting away? load replies (3)
DrGrX|6 years ago Trying to eliminate false positives at the expense of letting criminals go free is a staple of western criminal law dating back to 1760s. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone%27s_ratio
RHSeeger|6 years ago Convicted isn't the right metric. Accusing someone of some crimes (generally anything sexually related or child related) is enough to ruin their life.
Jill_the_Pill|6 years ago
sadris|6 years ago
DrGrX|6 years ago
RHSeeger|6 years ago