(no title)
chrisolsen | 15 years ago
You should be able to see the bug on a *nix box with:
> date '+%m-%d-%G' # shows up as 01-01-2010
where as the following works fine.
>date '+%m-%d-%y' # 01-01-2011
I guess it's not really a bug since %G is the year of ISO week number, but it would be easy for something like this to go unnoticed until the invalid date pops up.
No comments yet.