Emacs is one of those software systems I'm really grateful for. My life is significantly better because I'm in a world where it exists - "better" meaning more joyful, more positively productive, and more enabled to be of service (since I use it for writing articles and opensource software, etc. Not to mention the code behind my company, so it's even helping me create jobs.)
I really, really want to use Emacs. I like the ideas, I like the addons, I like the lispiness. What I can't get over, though, is the pinky contortions and multiple chords required to accomplish things in the editor itself.
I'm not a big fan of vimscript, and the addons seem more clunky, but being able to hit a single key, rather than a chord, or series of chords, to accomplish the basic text manipulations, makes it really hard for me to stop using vim and use emacs for more than a few days.
Seconded. Even after years of using Emacs, I still have to stop for a moment every now and then and think: holy shit, what a motherflippin' piece of software!
I have been using the package manager and it is a much better way to install programs in emacs than the old way of modifying your .emacs and specifying a load path. It works very well. I wish more people would upload packages to the main repository but putting this in emacs 24 will probably accelerate this.
I like the new policy, which seems to be one potentially disrupting new technology per major release. Previously, major releases tried to do too much at once, which lead to some very unstable and sometimes alienating .0 releases.
Emacs 395 would be much nicer than Visual Studio 2150 or an Eclipse named after a small asteroid that hasn't been discovered yet (because, by then, all rounded-body names will have been used)
[+] [-] redsymbol|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] psadauskas|15 years ago|reply
I'm not a big fan of vimscript, and the addons seem more clunky, but being able to hit a single key, rather than a chord, or series of chords, to accomplish the basic text manipulations, makes it really hard for me to stop using vim and use emacs for more than a few days.
[+] [-] kleiba|15 years ago|reply
...and I get really happy :-)
[+] [-] nagnatron|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zitterbewegung|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] krobertson|15 years ago|reply
That is the first time I've seen anyone use Bazaar as an example of a DVC that is gaining in popularity.
[+] [-] BCM43|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eeperson|15 years ago|reply
Does anyone know if the concurrency and lexbind features are still planned to be part of Emacs 24?
[+] [-] docgnome|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jbellis|15 years ago|reply
What changed to go from releases every 4-7 years, to releases every 1-2 years?
[+] [-] abrahamsen|15 years ago|reply
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-02/msg021...
I like the new policy, which seems to be one potentially disrupting new technology per major release. Previously, major releases tried to do too much at once, which lead to some very unstable and sometimes alienating .0 releases.
[+] [-] rbanffy|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] danh|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rbanffy|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gsivil|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] danh|15 years ago|reply
http://repo.or.cz/w/emacs.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/etc/NEWS
[+] [-] sigzero|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hasenj|15 years ago|reply
It gets it automatically on a terminal that supports it (such as konsole) but having it sort of built in would be nice.
[+] [-] zoul|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sammyo|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hgiug|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] Bud|15 years ago|reply
In 2150, will we be using "Emacs 395"?
Maybe I should get my old vt100 out of the closet and see if it still works.
[+] [-] dedward|15 years ago|reply
As long as we still use text entry for programming, we'll still be using emacs.... it will keep up with the times.
[+] [-] rbanffy|15 years ago|reply