With these prices it looks like they're not targeting cubesats, which I'm sure is a relief to the existing rideshare companies. It will be interesting to see how good they are at launching on time. Since SpaceX can shift around Starlink launches to help their schedule, they might have a bit of an advantage over conventional rideshare companies.
>For payloads who run into development or production challenges leading up to launch, SpaceX will allow them to apply 100% of monies paid towards the cost of rebooking on a subsequent mission (rebooking fees may apply).
Without knowing the magnitude of the rebooking fees this isn't a very informative statement.
Sun-Synchronous Orbit... huh, that one you can't do in Kerbal Space Program.
Turns out SSO is exploiting the fact that Earth isn't a perfect sphere, and so you can use the non-spherically-symmetric gravity field to induce precession in your orbital plane. If you tune the precession go 360° per year, you get a Sun-Synchronous Orbit.
Because they are posting pricing, I'm curious about the details. What happens if the rocket fails and loses the payload? Is there insurance included/available? Does the customer get a refund?
Satellite insurance is a fairly big industry. The owner of the satellite being launched is responsible for getting said insurance against the satellite. This can cover anomalies during launch [1] or anomalies on orbit where the satellite is lost or can no longer perform its mission [2]. Pretty much all commercial companies will have insurance on their satellites, government satellites are typically "self-insured".
If I'm not mistaken, the company supplying the payload usually has to insure the payload, and depending on the launch companies track record (and therefore risk) they get better/worse conditions. Of course the insurance company will then try to get their money from the launch company in the case of failure.
Coincidental that you mention this. AMOS-6, launching tomorrow on an F9 is getting a free ride, since the previous version of the satellite blew up on the pad.
Haha. I had the exact same thought. Lots of images with blocks of white behind white text. And the font is horrible. I guess sacrifices have to be made somewhere when you’re changing the world.
The transferable nature of the ride seems like a big gamble pared with their statement that launches won't be held up by co-passengers. Guess they're just counting on the odds that enough passengers will drop out to make the launch uneconomic will be fairly low.
[+] [-] Rebelgecko|6 years ago|reply
>For payloads who run into development or production challenges leading up to launch, SpaceX will allow them to apply 100% of monies paid towards the cost of rebooking on a subsequent mission (rebooking fees may apply).
Without knowing the magnitude of the rebooking fees this isn't a very informative statement.
[+] [-] tlrobinson|6 years ago|reply
Also, they do say this:
> Cubesats can be aggregated and launched on a customer provided, ESPA-compatible deployer.
[+] [-] _Microft|6 years ago|reply
https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/08/spacex-enters-compet...
[+] [-] TeMPOraL|6 years ago|reply
Turns out SSO is exploiting the fact that Earth isn't a perfect sphere, and so you can use the non-spherically-symmetric gravity field to induce precession in your orbital plane. If you tune the precession go 360° per year, you get a Sun-Synchronous Orbit.
Decent.
--
[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun-synchronous_orbit#Technica...
[+] [-] EdwinHoksberg|6 years ago|reply
--
[1] https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/162200...
[+] [-] ortusdux|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ExodusOrbitals1|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bobbles|6 years ago|reply
Does anyone know what a traditional cost would be vs the $2.25M quoted?
[+] [-] tzfld|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] philip1209|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dr_orpheus|6 years ago|reply
[1] https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/news/breaking-news/s... [2] https://spacenews.com/digitalglobe-loses-worldview-4-satelli...
[+] [-] hobofan|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] starik36|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] greedo|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] b_tterc_p|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mholt|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] garmaine|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] varjag|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] garmaine|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dnjdrbdhdbs|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pardavis|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vonseel|6 years ago|reply
What are satellites even used for these days besides navigation and espionage (limited to a handful of large players, I assume)?
[+] [-] eznoonze|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] alephnan|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] Cthulhu_|6 years ago|reply
We've been going into space for 60 years, we've only gone to cyberspace for 30.
[+] [-] mholt|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ntpeters|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] paxys|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ideasRgood|6 years ago|reply
But my God do the engineering equations for fluid Dynamics are nuts when you have an open, changing, turbulent system.
[+] [-] penagwin|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tehlike|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jonplackett|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ExodusOrbitals1|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rtkwe|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mlindner|6 years ago|reply