top | item 20709330

(no title)

jusben1369 | 6 years ago

I'm pretty sure this is a bizarre twist where it's a founder getting screwed over with no stock, vs a "regular" non-executive.

discuss

order

frakkingcylons|6 years ago

It's an unfortunate mix of both, according to The Information. A co-founder, early investors, and employees aren't receiving stock because their contracts were dependent on future fund raises (which never emerged).