(no title)
vilaca | 6 years ago
Obviously saying 'could' is not the same as saying 'should' and it's not very safe to do drastic changes to your diet without consulting a MD.
vilaca | 6 years ago
Obviously saying 'could' is not the same as saying 'should' and it's not very safe to do drastic changes to your diet without consulting a MD.
joe_the_user|6 years ago
webmaven|6 years ago
rjf72|6 years ago
Stories like this are part of what convinced me to give fasting a go. And after going on 2 years of it now, I've had the exact opposite experience of that which you describe. In particular I don't eat the same total amount of food/calories, I eat substantially less. And somehow I have substantially more energy. The reason I decided to try out fasting is because it seems evident that we're eating far more than we need, as the absurd rates of obesity/overweight attest to.
Blaming the lack of exercise is somewhat nonsensical as can be shown from more ancient peoples. But it can also be shown numerically. I now bike around 5k a day and that burns about 100 calories. That's 15 minutes of biking to burn the equivalent of about a third of a slice of pizza. Exercise is of course important, but not for the calorie burning. If you eat poorly (or too much) it doesn't matter if you spend hours at the gym - you're gonna get fat.
I think the actual truth is that in modern times we've trained our bodies to expect far too much food. Fortunately this is really easy to reverse. It just requires accepting a discomfort that fades somewhat quickly over the months.
[1] - http://rewild.com/in-depth/leisure.html
tptacek|6 years ago