(no title)
jchrome | 6 years ago
And GDPR only requires that you opt in. So when you sign into the TV for the first time, it gives you an opt in choice and many do it. The States is less regulated but will be soon.
jchrome | 6 years ago
And GDPR only requires that you opt in. So when you sign into the TV for the first time, it gives you an opt in choice and many do it. The States is less regulated but will be soon.
Liquid_Fire|6 years ago
> We don’t use pre-ticked boxes or any other type of default consent.
> We use clear, plain language that is easy to understand.
> We specify why we want the data and what we’re going to do with it.
> We give separate distinct (‘granular’) options to consent separately to different purposes and types of processing.
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protectio...
These are of course just guidelines, but if you don't explicitly inform your users that you will be sending images of what's on the screen over the Internet, you are likely to get in trouble. (And no, a giant EULA-type wall of text probably wouldn't be sufficient)
Silhouette|6 years ago
Edit: Also, on your first point, ACR is generally a variation of fingerprinting technology. It wouldn't be sending entire screenshots of whatever is being displayed even if it's not broadcast content, at least not in any variation I've heard of. It was the idea of uploading the entire image that I was questioning before.
jchrome|6 years ago
And I also don't think it's easy to escape the scope of GDPR. I'm just saying companies come up with ways of being "GDPR compliant" and they've done so.