top | item 21061393

“China's Tesla” NIO slashes thousands of jobs as losses mount

171 points| partingshots | 6 years ago |asia.nikkei.com | reply

177 comments

order
[+] sremani|6 years ago|reply
China has around 25 electric car manufacturers not too unlike Detroit in its hay-day in 1920s. Sooner or later many will crash and burn and some merge to become bigger players. Long story short, industries with heavy CapEx sooner or later end up being handful of players.

BYD buses and ABQ rapid transit saga is an interesting one. Most of the Chinese electrics are not up to the snuff and so Albuquerque decided not to order any new buses and send back the ones delivered.

[+] reaperducer|6 years ago|reply
Sadly, the people in ABQ I know blame their city government for this fiasco, and not the manufacturer. They're still sore about the empty bus-only lanes running down some main streets that were built for this.
[+] cmarschner|6 years ago|reply
Yes and I recently read overall investment is around $28 billion in electric vehicles, across all these startups. By comparison, VW alone is investing €80 billion.
[+] duxup|6 years ago|reply
Yeah there are some good articles noting how many manufacturers there are and they basically expect a large % to fall by the wayside dude to being behind with tech, funding, connections, etc. My understanding is there are maybe a handful at most that investors and analysts think have nearly enough of what is needed to make a good longer term run at it.
[+] kwhitefoot|6 years ago|reply
Could buy them from Volvo in Sweden instead. That's the truck and bus company that is still Swedish not the car company that was sold off to Ford in 1999 and is now owned by Geely.
[+] gamblor956|6 years ago|reply
Same with LA Metro's BYD order. Their buses are some of the newest in the fleet but have the same quantity and severity of maintenance issues as the oldest operational buses in the fleet.
[+] mycall|6 years ago|reply
I'm surprised as Shenzhen has 16,000+ electric buses (BYD?)
[+] gibolt|6 years ago|reply
It seems to me like China wants the electric car manufacturing revolution to mainly be under their control/borders. My guess is that the reason they allowed Tesla so willingly is that Nio and other local companies had already started crashing hard and BYD with their tiny battery packs were unlikely to drive sufficient adoption, especially for export. The only way to grab the market was to lure in the best and drive more internal competition.
[+] JumpCrisscross|6 years ago|reply
> The only way to grab the market was to lure in the best and drive more internal competition

Post-Xi China isn't really about internal competition. More likely they're hoping to replicate Tesla's IP. (Tesla, in turn, bets it can gain more from selling in China than the IP it will lose in domestically-fabricated components.)

[+] toinetoine|6 years ago|reply

  BYD with their tiny battery packs
My friend bought a BYD sedan last year for 100k RMB ($15k) and it gets ~300km per charge.
[+] natch|6 years ago|reply
Makes sense. I think there’s also a bit of the killer being killed by Tesla here, because people want Teslas more.
[+] d2161|6 years ago|reply
I got the impression you feel that's a bad thing, but I think it's just me. To me a rational governments would want its country to grow. And economic growth is accomplished by having new or growing businesses.

I agree Tesla was allowed as part of their benefit. I don't think Tesla benefits any of those Chinese automakers. No one wants a competitor. Sure, Tesla would help the crap companies die faster and force the rest to adapt to higher standards. But I think the real intention is for Chinese consumers to benefit from a superior and less polluting product. They are aggressively environmental nowadays afterall.

[+] xvector|6 years ago|reply
I am convinced that everyone prefixing headlines with "China's Tesla" is trying to short Tesla.
[+] navigatesol|6 years ago|reply
Yes, everyone criticizing the company is a short seller making up lies to earn a few bucks. The lawsuits, fraudulent buyouts, sketchy accounting, executive overturn, ridiculous promises, lousy financials...

It's all made up. A giant conspiracy of short sellers.

[+] yalogin|6 years ago|reply
Well the problem with cars is they cost a lot to make and the leeway for do overs is very less. China can co-opt IP but getting things right is very different with cars compared to consumer electronics, where they can iterate and improve.
[+] ivankolev|6 years ago|reply
Somewhat tangential, I just visited a Polestar 2 booth set-up downtown Toronto, it's designed by Volvo but will be manufactured in China, it is really impressive vehicle, both looks and specs.
[+] throwaway1777|6 years ago|reply
Over 50k euro price though. You get what you pay for.
[+] cpursley|6 years ago|reply
While I agree the Polestars are neat from a performance perspective, Volvos are some of the most unreliable vehicles that you can buy. But Luxury && Performance != Quality.
[+] baybal2|6 years ago|reply
I once wrote about them here. I questioned their rationale of trying to "beat" Tesla when Tesla itself was deep in red.

Were they took the enormous amount amount of money they got from investors, and put it into making electric Suzuki Alto lookalikes, they would've been bathing in cash now.

But no, those guys not only did not recognise Tesla's failure, but they doubled down on it, and ran a car company as if it was some Internet dotcom.

[+] nickik|6 years ago|reply
Tesla has not failed and is clearly not a failure.
[+] dayaz36|6 years ago|reply
"China's Tesla" IS Tesla
[+] Leary|6 years ago|reply
It took Tesla 16 years to become profitable, does Nio have enough cash to last another 12?
[+] DSingularity|6 years ago|reply
Do you mean does China have enough cash?
[+] blang|6 years ago|reply
Is it profitable?
[+] akhilcacharya|6 years ago|reply
Has an "X" Killer company or product ever actually Killed X?
[+] rnhmjoj|6 years ago|reply
Mozilla comes to mind.