[BlackRing]

That's quite the claim. Where's your evidence?

I'm only stating a name many of them have branded themselves as, and proudly at that. It's a point of discussion and quite frankly disturbing people make assumptions as to those who use it.

Everything is presented verifiable with the smallest of effort.

[airbreather]

And here is the root of many problems, the assumption that someone is "right wing", or "left wing", or whatever, just because of one view or idea known. With the following assumption that their personality, behaviors and thoughts can be predicted.

It's usually associated with come kind of bigotry and used as put down describing someone as being in another camp to the writer.

There are people in the world who have opinions based on critical thinking that are individually arisen at, per item.

Many are just pragmatic.

Some just don't have the ability to form a different view in some cases because they have not witnessed or experienced various forms of prejudice, persecution, being exploited and so on.

And that doesn't make them privileged, at most it makes them luckily ignorant.

There is no "side" or "group" that holds the entire high morel ground in anything.

"What if I told you that a bird needs both wings to fly?".