top | item 21157115

Hundreds of Propaganda Accounts Targeting Iran and Qatar Removed from Facebook

130 points| pulisse | 6 years ago |buzzfeednews.com | reply

74 comments

order
[+] panpanna|6 years ago|reply
The article points out PR firms in Nigeria, Egypt and UAE.

> Increasingly, we're seeing more PR firms or strategic communication firms offer computational propaganda as a service for all sorts of clients, including governments.

Now consider this, if this happens at this scale for the small cost of $150.000 how many pr-firms are engaging in propaganda against some commercial target right now without your ever noticing?

[+] Faark|6 years ago|reply
Notably absent in heap of recent articles about social media manipulations are western governments. I have a hard time believing that everyone is doing it but us, and our guys don't want/have that capability. This is hardly something that can be brought up to speed anywhere but in the field, so I'd expect there to be traces.

Now there could be many of reasons for that absence of news. Media could be constrained by gov. More likely is social networks being forced to keep silent. Soft power of / direct access to those US companies might be good enough for US intelligence to not warrant further actions risking trust in the platforms. Actions might take place on battlefields far away & not observed by western media (like, how would you even start getting around e.g. ID requirements in china... seems kind of hard).

Anyway, I just found noteworthy how well this one fits US geopolitical interests.

[+] reaperducer|6 years ago|reply
Now consider this, if this happens at this scale for the small cost of $150.000 how many pr-firms are engaging in propaganda against some commercial target right now without your ever noticing?

You mean like the way certain east (and probably west) coast billionaires spending millions to influence elections in the flyover states?

[+] bilbo0s|6 years ago|reply
I think everyone has taken notice. The propaganda right now is too all encompassing so we can't help but to take notice.

Even on HN the past few years the number of propaganda posts and comments has gone up and up and up. Continues to increase right now.

What can people do though? Other people have the right to free speech. You just have to try to tune out all of the Anti-Tech, Anti-China, Anti-US, Anti-Amazon, Anti-Iran, Anti-Trump, Anti-Immigrant, Anti-Obama, Anti-minority, Anti-etc etc etc blather.

[+] jjtheblunt|6 years ago|reply
Your point to consider made me think how curiously common negative mention of Apple is in Forbes, for example.
[+] pnako|6 years ago|reply
I would not even be surprised to learn that billionaires buy newspapers to push their views.
[+] josefresco|6 years ago|reply
So propaganda is not allowed, by political ads that contain lies are allowed. Aren't lies in political ads by the ruling party or candidate ... propaganda?
[+] mywittyname|6 years ago|reply
Yes.

And there should be facilities in place to punish those who push knowingly false narratives, but that's a damn-near impossible task to achieve.

[+] vkou|6 years ago|reply
It's about as consistent as people complaining about the Kremlin lying on Facebook, but not some billionaire lying on Facebook.

Bonus points when you don't even know who he is, because his money has been laundered through a PAC. Oh, and we get to subsidize his speech, because it's tax-deductible for him.

Double bonus points if, in a slightly different situation, that billionaire has been borrowing money for his various business ventures from friends of the Kremlin, and happens to look a wee bit orange...

[+] dillondoyle|6 years ago|reply
political ads have reporting and disclaimers, or minimally an attempt at transparency. Bots/propaganda online pretends to be someone else, does not proclaim the source.
[+] aritmo|6 years ago|reply
In the military, this is also called PSYOPS.
[+] throwaway672|6 years ago|reply
The problems on Twitter are worse. There are networks of verified accounts pumping out orchestrated propaganda on this topic, and others. A blue check mark seems to be a license to generate money with impunity. There are networks operating out of first world countries with verified accounts, that have third-world minions that amplify their messages through retweets and likes. It is surprising that corporations continue to associate with the open sewer of propaganda, hate and harassment that Twitter is. Has the time come for a clean clone of Twitter for business to interact with their customers?
[+] zarro|6 years ago|reply
"The censor was a magistrate in ancient Rome who was responsible for maintaining the census, supervising public morality, and overseeing certain aspects of the government's finances.

The power of the censors was absolute: no magistrate could oppose their decisions, only another censor who succeeded them could cancel it.

The censors' regulation of public morality is the origin of the modern meaning of the words censor and censorship."

[+] zachguo|6 years ago|reply
Is it really appropriate to let platforms determine what is propaganda or not?
[+] sharkjacobs|6 years ago|reply
Maybe not to determine what "propaganda" is, but I think it's reasonable, and necessary for them to determine what real accounts are.

> The accounts, which have now been taken down, appear to have been professionally run by PR firms

These aren't real users and presumably violate the terms of service.

[+] empath75|6 years ago|reply
What's the alternative? Forcing them to publish material that they don't want to?
[+] pooya13|6 years ago|reply
It’s odd that in the entire article they don’t mention anything about the actual content of this propaganda against Iran. I wonder for example, was the current news about Iran attacking oil tankers part of this campaign?
[+] ianai|6 years ago|reply
You can probably assume it’s whatever Russia and Putin would want it to be.
[+] ilaksh|6 years ago|reply
Does Facebook take down the propaganda accounts linked to the US? Or we are all still supposed to believe that the "good guys" stopped using propaganda after WWII?
[+] klingonopera|6 years ago|reply
Taking down anti-Iran propaganda would be something that does not align with US goals. I find it quite surprising that Facebook's doing this, to be honest.
[+] Udik|6 years ago|reply
I just checked, these "official" [1] propaganda pages for Israel are still there:

https://www.facebook.com/DailyCupOfJane/

https://www.facebook.com/HistoryBites/

https://www.facebook.com/ThisExplainsThat/

https://www.facebook.com/WeOnlyHaveOneEarth/

[1] https://www.theisraelproject.org/socialmedia

"The Israel Project has developed a cutting edge production shop to inform the 21st century media and public conversation. Using videos, memes, infographics and other original productions – TIP is ensuring social media users know the truth about Israel and the Middle East."

"the Facebook page Cup of Jane. Serving the young women’s community, it has built up over 450,000 followers in that short time. ... Since then, we have launched multiple communities including HistoryBites for history fans, This Explains That for news junkies and We Only Have One Earth for environmentally-minded folks"

[+] throwaway122378|6 years ago|reply
Individuals posting propaganda is far less concerning to me than a private company deciding what propaganda is.
[+] ianai|6 years ago|reply
Wake me up when it’s the hundred of thousands that are on there.
[+] markdown|6 years ago|reply
And WEST PAPUA!!! Frustrating to see the Indonesian genocide of the West Papuan people is ignored.

There is far far worse going on in West Papua then is going on in Iran or Qatar, but Buzzfeed chooses to write about them instead.

The FB press release clearly mentions Indonesia and West Papua but it's ignored yet again by the western press.

https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2019/10/removing-coordinated-in...

[+] jin7|6 years ago|reply
I did nothing, but my account has been deleted. Of course, I rarely use Facebook.
[+] aritmo|6 years ago|reply
Did you post anything political?
[+] benkarst|6 years ago|reply
Buzzfeed eliminating the competition.