[arctangent]

While I recognise the valid points made elsewhere in this discussion about this guy’s luck and/or cheating, I can’t help wonder about how we would react differently to an AI “oracle” that gave useful solutions to problems we can’t /couldn’t solve. Where is the boundary between experiential evidence and statistical “proof”?

[beart]

I'm not sure I fully understand your comment but I certainly wouldn't wager my money playing poker against the system you describe.

[logical42]

Both would suck to play against but the AI oracle would play optimally and not perfectly.