top | item 21232779 (no title) DickieStarshine | 6 years ago Have you looked at Julia? discuss order hn newest MiroF|6 years ago Julia is compiled to machine code, not interpreted fiddlerwoaroof|6 years ago Many lisps compile to machine code too. Compilation vs. interpretation is a feature of an implementation, not a language. load replies (1) vanderZwan|6 years ago That has nothing to do with how "lispy" it might be. Part of the compiler is implemented in femtolispe no? load replies (1) e12e|6 years ago Julia is currently (only) jit. AOT is stil work in progress AFAIK.It's about as "compiled" as Luajit is.
MiroF|6 years ago Julia is compiled to machine code, not interpreted fiddlerwoaroof|6 years ago Many lisps compile to machine code too. Compilation vs. interpretation is a feature of an implementation, not a language. load replies (1) vanderZwan|6 years ago That has nothing to do with how "lispy" it might be. Part of the compiler is implemented in femtolispe no? load replies (1) e12e|6 years ago Julia is currently (only) jit. AOT is stil work in progress AFAIK.It's about as "compiled" as Luajit is.
fiddlerwoaroof|6 years ago Many lisps compile to machine code too. Compilation vs. interpretation is a feature of an implementation, not a language. load replies (1)
vanderZwan|6 years ago That has nothing to do with how "lispy" it might be. Part of the compiler is implemented in femtolispe no? load replies (1)
e12e|6 years ago Julia is currently (only) jit. AOT is stil work in progress AFAIK.It's about as "compiled" as Luajit is.
MiroF|6 years ago
fiddlerwoaroof|6 years ago
vanderZwan|6 years ago
e12e|6 years ago
It's about as "compiled" as Luajit is.