(no title)
jnamaya | 6 years ago
I told my wife, that's Richard! and I stopped right in the middle of the street and jumped out of the car. I ran toward him and hugged him, and told him to take care of himself and be strong. He didn't say a word.
I feel bad for the man, he looked a bit frail, and mind absent.
I can't believe history is being rewritten right in front of my eyes, the man that started it all is being forgotten. Open Source is just a catchy marketing phrase for "free software"
aquabeagle|6 years ago
Maybe because you stopped in the middle of the street and jumped out of your car and then accosted him?
hutzlibu|6 years ago
Nope. Even RMS even insist it is not. Main difference is, free software usually enforces "copyleft".
And open source not.
rmusial|6 years ago
"Another misunderstanding of “open source” is the idea that it means “not using the GNU GPL.” This tends to accompany another misunderstanding that “free software” means “GPL-covered software.” These are both mistaken, since the GNU GPL qualifies as an open source license and most of the open source licenses qualify as free software licenses. There are many free software licenses aside from the GNU GPL."
The Open Source Initiative sees the GPL as Open Source, and the Free Software Foundation sees the ISC (OpenBSD license) as Free Software. Neither group's definition depends on if it is copyleft of permissive.
orangeshark|6 years ago